The speed of the sphere at the bottom of the incline is 8.37 m/s using a gravitational acceleration of g = 9.8 m/s² and considering the rotational inertia of the solid sphere as 2/5 * m * r².
To calculate the speed of the sphere at the bottom of the incline, we can use the principle of conservation of energy. The initial potential energy of the sphere at the top of the incline is m * g * h. This potential energy is converted into both translational kinetic energy and rotational kinetic energy at the bottom of the incline.
The translational kinetic energy is given by (1/2) * m * v², where v is the velocity of the sphere. The rotational kinetic energy is given by (1/2) * I * ω², where I is the rotational inertia and ω is the angular velocity of the sphere. Since the sphere rolls without slipping, the velocity v and the angular velocity ω are related by v = ω * r, where r is the radius of the sphere.
Equating the initial potential energy to the sum of translational and rotational kinetic energies, we can solve for v, which represents the speed of the sphere at the bottom of the incline.
Learn more about velocity here:
brainly.com/question/30559316
#SPJ11
1 kg of silver (c = 234 J/kg K) is heated to 100°C. It is then dropped into 1 kg of water (c = 4190 J/kg K) at 0°C in an insulated beaker. Determine the common temperature in °C when the water and silver reach thermal equilibrium.
The common temperature when the silver and water reach thermal equilibrium is approximately -150.42°C.
To find the common temperature when the silver and water reach thermal equilibrium, we can use the principle of energy conservation. The heat lost by the silver is equal to the heat gained by the water.
The heat lost by the silver can be calculated using the formula:
Qsilver = m × csilver × ∆Tsilver
where m is the mass, csilver is the specific heat capacity of silver, and ∆Tsilver is the temperature change of the silver.
The heat gained by the water can be calculated using the formula:
Qwater = m × cwater × ∆T_water
where cwater is the specific heat capacity of water, and ∆T_water is the temperature change of the water.
Since the system is insulated, the heat lost by the silver is equal to the heat gained by the water:
Qsilver = Qwater
m × csilver × ∆Tsilver = m × cwater × ∆T_water
Simplifying the equation:
csilver × ∆Tsilver = cwater × ∆T_water
∆Tsilver / ∆T_water = cwater / csilver
∆Tsilver = (∆T_water × cwater) / csilver
∆Tsilver = (0°C - 100°C) × 4190 J/kg K / 234 J/kg K
∆Tsilver = -150.42°C
The change in temperature of the silver is -150.42°C.
To find the common temperature, we need to subtract this change in temperature from the initial temperature of the water:
Common temperature = 0°C - (-150.42°C)
Common temperature ≈ 150.42°C
Therefore, the common temperature when the silver and water reach thermal equilibrium is approximately 150.42°C.
Read more on Thermal equilibrium here: https://brainly.com/question/14556352
#SPJ11
Calculate the equivalent resistance of a 18052 resistor connected in parallel w 6602 resistor.
The equivalent resistance of the two resistors connected in parallel is 4834.07 Ω which can be obtained by the formula for calculating parallel resistances: 1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3 + ...
When resistors are connected in parallel, the reciprocal of the equivalent resistance is the sum of the reciprocals of the individual resistances.
This is the formula for calculating parallel resistances: 1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3 + ... where Req is the equivalent resistance and R1, R2, R3, and so on are the individual resistances.
Now let's apply this formula to our problem.
The individual resistances are 18052 Ω and 6602 Ω.
R1= 18052 Ω and R2= 6602 Ω.
1/Req = 1/18052 + 1/6602
Simplify and solve: 1/Req = (6602 + 18052)/(18052 × 6602)
⇒ 1/Req = 0.000207
⇒ Req = 4834.07 Ω
Therefore, the equivalent resistance of the two resistors connected in parallel is 4834.07 Ω.
Learn more about equivalent resistance: https://brainly.com/question/11241986
#SPJ11
A car with mass 1.8 × 103 kg starts from rest at the top of a 5.0 m long driveway that is inclined at 16.0° with respect to the horizontal. An average friction force of 3.6 × 103 N impedes the motion of the car
a. Determine the starting height of the car.
b. Find the work done by friction as the car rolls down the driveway.
c. Find the final speed of the car at the bottom of the driveway.
Please show work for each
Substituting the calculated values for h and the work done by friction, and solving for v: (1.8 × 10^3 kg) * (9.8 m/s^2) * sin(16.0°) = (1/2) * (1.8 × 10^3 kg) * v^2 + Work
To solve this problem, we'll break it down into three parts: finding the starting height of the car, calculating the work done by friction, and determining the final speed of the car at the bottom of the driveway.
(a) Starting Height of the Car:
The potential energy of the car at the top of the driveway is equal to its gravitational potential energy, given by:
PE = m * g * h
where m is the mass of the car, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the starting height.
Given:
m = 1.8 × 10^3 kg
g = 9.8 m/s^2 (approximate value)
To find the starting height, we'll use trigonometry. The vertical component of the gravitational force is mg, and it can be related to the starting height by:
mg * sin(theta) = m * g * h
where theta is the angle of inclination of the driveway.
Substituting the given values:
theta = 16.0°
m * g * h = m * g * sin(theta)
Simplifying:
h = sin(theta) = sin(16.0°)
Now we can calculate the starting height:
h = (1.8 × 10^3 kg) * (9.8 m/s^2) * sin(16.0°)
(b) Work Done by Friction:
The work done by friction can be calculated using the formula:
Work = Force * Distance
In this case, the force of friction is given as 3.6 × 10^3 N, and the distance is the length of the driveway.
Given:
Force of friction = 3.6 × 10^3 N
Distance = 5.0 m
Work = (3.6 × 10^3 N) * (5.0 m)
(c) Final Speed of the Car at the Bottom of the Driveway:
To find the final speed of the car, we'll use the principle of conservation of mechanical energy. The initial mechanical energy (potential energy at the top of the driveway) is converted into the final mechanical energy (kinetic energy at the bottom of the driveway) and the work done by friction.
The initial mechanical energy is equal to the potential energy at the top of the driveway:
Initial mechanical energy = m * g * h
The final mechanical energy is equal to the kinetic energy at the bottom of the driveway:
Final mechanical energy = (1/2) * m * v^2
where v is the final speed of the car.
Since mechanical energy is conserved, we have:
Initial mechanical energy = Final mechanical energy + Work done by friction
m * g * h = (1/2) * m * v^2 + Work
Substituting the calculated values for h and the work done by friction, and solving for v:
(1.8 × 10^3 kg) * (9.8 m/s^2) * sin(16.0°) = (1/2) * (1.8 × 10^3 kg) * v^2 + Work
Finally, we can solve for v.
Please note that I've provided the general steps to solve the problem, but the exact numerical calculations are omitted. To obtain the numerical values and perform the calculations, please substitute the given values and solve using a calculator or software.
Visit here to learn more about friction brainly.com/question/28356847
#SPJ11
How many electrons does carbon have? how many are valence electrons? what third-row element has the same number of valence electrons as carbon?
Carbon has 6 electrons. To determine the number of valence electrons, we need to look at the electron configuration of carbon, which is 1s² 2s² 2p². The third-row element that has the same number of valence electrons as carbon is silicon (Si).
In the case of carbon, the first shell (1s) is fully filled with 2 electrons, and the second shell (2s and 2p) contains the remaining 4 electrons. The 2s subshell can hold a maximum of 2 electrons, and the 2p subshell can hold a maximum of 6 electrons, but in carbon's case, only 2 of the 2p orbitals are occupied. These 4 electrons in the outermost shell, specifically the 2s² and 2p² orbitals, are called valence electrons. The electron configuration describes the distribution of electrons in the different energy levels or shells of an atom.
Therefore, carbon has 4 valence electrons. Valence electrons are crucial in determining the chemical properties and reactivity of an element, as they are involved in the formation of chemical bonds.
The third-row element that has the same number of valence electrons as carbon is silicon (Si). Silicon also has 4 valence electrons, which can be seen in its electron configuration of 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p². Carbon and silicon are in the same group (Group 14) of the periodic table and share similar chemical properties due to their comparable valence electron configurations.
To learn more about, valence electrons, click here, https://brainly.com/question/31264554
#SPJ11
Carbon has 6 electrons in total, with 4 of them being valence electrons. Silicon is the third-row element that shares the same number of valence electrons as carbon.
Explanation:Carbon has 6 electrons in total. The electron configuration and orbital diagram for carbon are 1s²2s²2p¹, where the 1s and 2s orbitals are completely filled and the remaining two electrons occupy the 2p subshell. This means that carbon has 4 valence electrons.
The third-row element that has the same number of valence electrons as carbon is silicon (Si). Silicon also has 4 valence electrons.
Learn more about Electrons in Carbon here:https://brainly.com/question/33829891
#SPJ3
If 2.4 C of charge passes a point in a wire in 0.6 s, what is
the electric current?
The electric current passing through the wire is 4 A (amperes).
Electric current is defined as the rate of flow of electric charge. It is measured in amperes (A), where 1 ampere is equivalent to 1 coulomb of charge passing through a point in 1 second.
In this case, 2.4 C (coulombs) of charge passes a point in the wire in 0.6 s. To calculate the electric current, we use the formula:
Electric Current = Charge / Time
Plugging in the given values, we have:
Electric Current = 2.4 C / 0.6 s = 4 A
Therefore, the electric current passing through the wire is 4 A. This means that 4 coulombs of charge flow through the wire every second.
It's important to note that electric current is a scalar quantity, representing the magnitude of the flow of charge. The direction of the current is determined by the direction of the flow of positive charges (conventional current) or negative charges (electron flow).
To know more about electric current click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1922668
#SPJ11
Far out in space, very far from any other gravitating objects, two spheres are located 0.74 m apart (center-to- center distance). The mass of sphere A is 29 kg, while the mass of sphere B is 15 kg. Sphere B is released from rest while sphere A is held in place at the origin of the coordinate system. What is the gravitational potential energy of the two-sphere system just as sphere B is released? Assume the potential energy would equal zero if the two masses were separated by an infinite distance. Your answer should be in nj (nanojoules = 10-9 J): = What is the kinetic energy of sphere B once it has moved 0.30 m toward sphere A? Your answer should be in nj (nanojoules = 10-9 J):
The gravitational potential energy of the two-sphere system just as sphere B is released is approximately -362.4 nj.
The kinetic energy of sphere B once it has moved 0.30 m toward sphere A is approximately -2274 nj.
To calculate the gravitational potential energy of the two-sphere system just as sphere B is released, we can use the formula:
Potential energy = - (G * mass_A * mass_B) / distance,
where G is the gravitational constant (approximately 6.674 × 10⁻¹¹ N·m²/kg²), mass_A is the mass of sphere A, mass_B is the mass of sphere B, and distance is the center-to-center distance between the two spheres.
mass_A = 29 kg,
mass_B = 15 kg,
distance = 0.74 m.
Plugging these values into the formula:
Potential energy = - (6.674 × 10⁻¹¹ N·m²/kg²) * (29 kg) * (15 kg) / (0.74 m).
Calculating this:
Potential energy ≈ - 3.624 × 10⁻⁷ J.
To convert this to nanojoules (nj), we multiply by 10^9:
Potential energy ≈ - 362.4 nj.
Therefore, the gravitational potential energy of the two-sphere system just as sphere B is released is approximately -362.4 nj.
To calculate the kinetic energy of sphere B once it has moved 0.30 m toward sphere A, we can use the conservation of mechanical energy. Since the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, we can equate the initial potential energy to the final kinetic energy.
Potential energy_initial = Kinetic energy_final.
Using the same formula for potential energy as before, and taking the new distance as 0.30 m:
Potential energy_final = - (6.674 × 10⁻¹¹ N·m²/kg²) * (29 kg) * (15 kg) / (0.30 m).
Calculating this:
Potential energy_final ≈ - 2.274 × 10⁻⁶ J.
Converting this to nanojoules (nj):
Potential energy_final ≈ - 2274 nj.
Therefore, the kinetic energy of sphere B once it has moved 0.30 m toward sphere A is approximately -2274 nj.
To know more about conservation of mechanical energy, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28928306#
#SPJ11
Pole thrown upward from initial velocity it takes 16s to hit the ground. a. what is the initial velocity of pole? b. What is max height? C. What is velocity when it hits the ground
Pole thrown upward from initial velocity it takes 16s to hit the ground. (a)The initial velocity of the pole is 78.4 m/s.(b) The maximum height reached by the pole is approximately 629.8 meters.(c)The velocity when the pole hits the ground is approximately -78.4 m/s.
To solve this problem, we can use the equations of motion for objects in free fall.
Given:
Time taken for the pole to hit the ground (t) = 16 s
a) To find the initial velocity of the pole, we can use the equation:
h = ut + (1/2)gt^2
where h is the height, u is the initial velocity, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and t is the time.
At the maximum height, the velocity of the pole is zero. Therefore, we can write:
v = u + gt
Since the final velocity (v) is zero at the maximum height, we can use this equation to find the time it takes for the pole to reach the maximum height.
Using these equations, we can solve the problem step by step:
Step 1: Find the time taken to reach the maximum height.
At the maximum height, the velocity is zero. Using the equation v = u + gt, we have:
0 = u + (-9.8 m/s^2) × t_max
Solving for t_max, we get:
t_max = u / 9.8
Step 2: Find the height reached at the maximum height.
Using the equation h = ut + (1/2)gt^2, and substituting t = t_max/2, we have:
h_max = u(t_max/2) + (1/2)(-9.8 m/s^2)(t_max/2)^2
Simplifying the equation, we get:
h_max = (u^2) / (4 × 9.8)
Step 3: Find the initial velocity of the pole.
Since it takes 16 seconds for the pole to hit the ground, the total time of flight is 2 × t_max. Thus, we have:
16 s = 2 × t_max
Solving for t_max, we get:
t_max = 8 s
Substituting this value into the equation t_max = u / 9.8, we can solve for u:
8 s = u / 9.8
u = 9.8 m/s × 8 s
u = 78.4 m/s
Therefore, the initial velocity of the pole is 78.4 m/s.
b) To find the maximum height, we use the equation derived in Step 2:
h_max = (u^2) / (4 × 9.8)
= (78.4 m/s)^2 / (4 × 9.8 m/s^2)
≈ 629.8 m
Therefore, the maximum height reached by the pole is approximately 629.8 meters.
c) To find the velocity when the pole hits the ground, we know that the initial velocity (u) is 78.4 m/s, and the time taken (t) is 16 s. Using the equation v = u + gt, we have:
v = u + gt
= 78.4 m/s + (-9.8 m/s^2) × 16 s
= 78.4 m/s - 156.8 m/s
≈ -78.4 m/s
The negative sign indicates that the velocity is in the opposite direction of the initial upward motion. Therefore, the velocity when the pole hits the ground is approximately -78.4 m/s.
To learn more about velocity visit: https://brainly.com/question/80295
#SPJ11
You place an object 17.6 cm in front of a diverging lens which has a focal length with a magnitude of 11.8 cm. Determine how far in front of the lens the object should be placed in order to produce an image that is reduced by a factor of 2.85. cm
We need to use the thin lens formula which relates the distance between the lens and the object (p), the distance between the lens and the image (q), and the focal length of the lens (f).
The formula is:1/f = 1/p + 1/q
We are given that: f = -11.8 cm (negative because the lens is a diverging lens) p = 17.6 cm q = ?
We need to determine the value of q for which the image is reduced by a factor of 2.85. This means that:
q/p = 1/2.85q = (1/2.85)pq = (1/2.85) * 17.6 cmq ≈ 6.168 cm
Now that we know the value of q, we can use the thin lens formula to determine the value of p that corresponds to this image:
p = q/(1/q - 1/f)
p = (6.168 cm)/[1/(6.168 cm) + 1/(11.8 cm)]
p ≈ 50.28 cm
Therefore, the object should be placed approximately 50.28 cm in front of the lens to produce an image that is reduced by a factor of 2.85.
Learn more about thin lens here: https://brainly.com/question/32233960
#SPJ11
Three identical point charges of magnitude 6nC are placed at the three corners of a square 40mm on a side. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the electric field due to the three charges at the vacant corner.
The magnitude and direction of the electric field due to the three charges at the vacant corner can be calculated using Coulomb's law. Coulomb's law states that the force between two charges is directly proportional to the product of their magnitudes and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.The electric field at the vacant corner is the vector sum of the electric fields due to the other three charges.
The magnitude of the electric field due to each of the three charges is given by;E = kq / r²where k is the Coulomb constant, q is the charge, and r is the distance between the charges.The distance between each of the charges and the vacant corner can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem since they are placed at the three corners of a square 40mm on a side.
Thus, the distance between each charge and the vacant corner is:√(40² + 40²) = 56.6 mmThe magnitude of the electric field due to each of the charges is:
E = (9 x 10⁹) x (6 x 10⁻⁹) / (0.0566)²E
= 45.4 N/C
The direction of the electric field due to the two charges on the horizontal side of the square will be at an angle of 45° to the x-axis, and the direction of the electric field due to the charge on the vertical side of the square will be at an angle of -45° to the y-axis.
Therefore, the resultant electric field at the vacant corner will be:E = √(45.4² + 45.4²) = 64.3 N/CThe angle made by the resultant electric field with the positive x-axis is given by:θ = tan⁻¹(45.4 / 45.4) = 45°Therefore, the magnitude and direction of the electric field due to the three charges at the vacant corner are 64.3 N/C and 45° with the positive x-axis, respectively.
To know more about electric field visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11482745
#SPJ11
A wire of 52 turns has a surface area vector A = (5i + 3j - 4k) cm2 and carries a current of 1.2 amps. The mass of the whole wire is 187 grams. There is a Magnetic field in the region equal to B = -3i + 7j – 3k mTeslas. a) Calculate the magnitude of the Magnetic Dipole Moment of this wire. b) What is the Torque on this wire due to the Magnetic field? c) What is the potential energy of this wire due to the Magnetic field? d) What is the potential energy of this wire when it is lined up with the B field? e) What is the velocity of the wire by the time it is lined up with the B field?
a) The magnitude of the Magnetic Dipole Moment of this wire is 263.4 μA m2. b) The torque on the wire due to the magnetic field is 1245.6 μN-m. c) The potential energy of the wire due to the magnetic field is -3229.7 μJ. d) The potential energy of the wire when it is lined up with the B field is -3229.7 μJ. e) The velocity of the wire when it is lined up with the B field is (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k)t
a) The magnetic dipole moment of the wire is given by;
μ = NIA
Where N is the number of turns, I is the current flowing,
and A is the surface area of the loopμ = 52*1.2*(5i + 3j - 4k) μA m2μ
= 187.2i + 112.32j - 149.76kμ
= 216.5 μA m2
Therefore, the magnitude of the Magnetic Dipole Moment of this wire is given by;
|μ| = √(187.2² + 112.32² + (-149.76)²)
|μ| = 263.4 μA m2
b) The torque τ on the wire due to the magnetic field is given by the cross product of the magnetic dipole moment of the wire and the magnetic field as follows;
τ = μ x BB
= -3i + 7j - 3k,
μ = 187.2i + 112.32j - 149.76k
τ = [112.32*(-3) - (-149.76)*7]i + [(-149.76)*(-3) - 187.2*(-3)]j + [187.2*7 - 112.32*(-3)]k
τ = -1226.4i - 65.88j + 1066.8k
Therefore, the torque on the wire due to the magnetic field is given by;
|τ| = √((-1226.4)² + (-65.88)² + 1066.8²)
|τ| = 1245.6 μN-m
c) The potential energy of the wire due to the magnetic field is given by;
U = -μ.B
U = -|μ||B| cosθ
U = -263.4 * √(3² + 7² + (-3)²)
U = -263.4 * √67
U = -3229.7 μJ
d) When the wire is lined up with the B field, the angle between the magnetic dipole moment and the magnetic field is θ = 0°
Therefore, the potential energy of the wire when it is lined up with the B field is given by;
U = -μ.B
U = -|μ||B| cos0°
U = -263.4 * √(3² + 7² + (-3)²)
U = -263.4 * √67
U = -3229.7 μJ
e) The force on the wire due to the magnetic field is given by;
F = I L x B
= (IA) x B
= (52*1.2 * (5i + 3j - 4k)) x (-3i + 7j - 3k)
F = [-122.4i + 73.44j - 97.92k] x [-3i + 7j - 3k]
F = [486.72i + 239.04j + 44.16k] Nm-2
The force is constant, and we know the mass of the wire. Therefore, we can find the acceleration of the wire as follows;
F = ma,
a = F/m
= [486.72i + 239.04j + 44.16k] / 0.187
a = 2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k m/s2
The velocity of the wire at any time t is given by;
v = at
v = (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k)t
When the wire is lined up with the B field, the direction of the force acting on it is perpendicular to the direction of the velocity, and there is no force acting on it. Therefore, the velocity of the wire will remain constant when it is lined up with the B field.
The velocity of the wire when it is lined up with the B field is;
v = (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k)t,
when t = ∞v = (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k) * ∞v
= (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k) m/s
Learn more About magnitude from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/30337362
#SPJ11
ONS statistics show that 63% of UK households are homeowners. The Bank of England claims that, due to the
very low interest rates in recent years, the actual proportion of home owners is actually higher. Investigate
this hypothesis by completing the following tasks:
a. Construct a confidence interval that has a high probability of including the true population proportion of
UK homeowners. Comment on your findings.
b. Use hypothesis testing to test the Bank of England claim. Comment on your findings.
c. The Bank of England also believes that UK North and South divides means that the combined proportion
of homeowners in the South East and South West is higher than the combined proportion of
homeowners in the North and North West. Test this hypothesis by:
1) Constructing and plotting two confidence intervals for the population proportions of combined
homeowners in the South East and South West and North and North West. Comment on your
findings.
2) Carrying out a hypothesis testing for two population proportions. Comment on your results.
a) Claim of a higher proportion of homeowners is statistically significant. b) will indicate the precision of our estimate and whether it supports the Bank of England's claim of a higher proportion of homeowners. c) The results of the hypothesis test will indicate whether the regional differences in homeownership proportions are statistically significant.
We aim to explore the hypothesis put forward by the Bank of England regarding the proportion of UK homeowners. We will construct a confidence interval to estimate the true population proportion of homeowners and perform hypothesis testing to assess the validity of the Bank of England's claim.
(a) To construct a confidence interval for the true population proportion of UK homeowners, we can use the sample proportion of 63% as an estimate. By applying appropriate statistical methods, such as the normal approximation method or the Wilson score interval, we can calculate a confidence interval with a desired level of confidence, e.g., 95%. This interval will provide an estimated range within which the true population proportion is likely to lie. The findings of the confidence interval will indicate the precision of our estimate and whether it supports the Bank of England's claim of a higher proportion of homeowners.
(b) Hypothesis testing can be employed to assess the Bank of England's claim. We would set up a null hypothesis stating that the proportion of homeowners is equal to the reported 63%, and an alternative hypothesis suggesting that it is higher. By conducting a statistical test, such as a z-test or a chi-square test, using an appropriate significance level (e.g., 5%), we can determine whether the evidence supports rejecting the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. The findings of the hypothesis test will provide insights into whether the claim of a higher proportion of homeowners is statistically significant.
(c) For investigating regional differences, we can construct and plot confidence intervals for the population proportions of combined homeowners in the South East/South West and the North/North West. By using appropriate statistical methods and confidence levels, we can estimate the ranges within which the true proportions lie. Comparing the two intervals will provide insights into whether there is a significant difference between the regions in terms of homeownership. Additionally, hypothesis testing for two population proportions can be conducted using appropriate tests, such as the z-test for independent proportions or the chi-square test for independence. The results of the hypothesis test will indicate whether the regional differences in homeownership proportions are statistically significant.
Learn more about hypothesis here: https://brainly.com/question/31362172
#SPJ11
The rms speed of the molecules of a gas at 143 °C is 217 m/s. Calculate the mass m of a single molecule in the gas.
The mass of a single molecule in the gas is approximately 4.54 x 10^(-26) kg.
The root mean square (rms) speed of gas molecules can be related to the temperature and the molar mass of the gas using the following equation:
v(rms) = √(3kT / m)
Where v(rms) is the rms speed, k is the Boltzmann constant (1.38 x 10^(-23) J/K), T is the temperature in Kelvin, and m is the molar mass of the gas in kilograms.
To solve for the mass of a single molecule, we need to convert the temperature from Celsius to Kelvin:
T(K) = 143°C + 273.15
Substituting the given values into the equation, we can solve for m:
217 m/s = √(3 * 1.38 x 10^(-23) J/K * (143 + 273.15) K / m)
Squaring both sides of the equation:
(217 m/s)^2 = 3 * 1.38 x 10^(-23) J/K * (143 + 273.15) K / m
Simplifying and rearranging the equation to solve for m:
m = 3 * 1.38 x 10^(-23) J/K * (143 + 273.15) K / (217 m/s)^2
Calculating the right-hand side of the equation:
m ≈ 4.54 x 10^(-26) kg
Therefore, the mass of a single molecule in the gas is approximately 4.54 x 10^(-26) kg.
learn more about root mean square (rms) speed here:
https://brainly.com/question/31830043
#SPJ11
A conductor of length 100 cm moves at right angles to a uniform magnetic field of flux density 1.5 Wb/m2 with velocity of 50meters/sec.
Calculate the e.m.f. induced in it.
Find also the value of induced e.m.f. when the conductor moves at an angle of 300 to the direction of the field
A conductor of length 100 cm moves at right angles to a
uniform magnetic
field of flux density 1.5 Wb/m2 with velocity of 50meters/sec, to find the induced emf.
The formula to determine the induced emf in a conductor is E= BVL sin (θ) where B is the magnetic field strength, V is the velocity of the conductor, L is the length of the conductor, and θ is the angle between the velocity and magnetic field vectors.
Let us determine the induced emf using the given
values
in the formula.E= BVL sin (θ)Given, B= 1.5 Wb/m2V= 50m/sL= 100 cm= 1 mθ= 30°= π/6 radTherefore, E= (1.5 Wb/m2) x 50 m/s x 1 m x sin (π/6)= 1.5 x 50 x 0.5= 37.5 VTherefore, the induced emf when the conductor moves at an angle of 300 to the direction of the field is 37.5 V.
to know more about
uniform magnetic
pls visit-
https://brainly.com/question/1594227
#SPJ11
A well-known (but probably apocryphal) Einstein quote is 'Sit on a hot stove for five minutes, and it feels like an hour. Talk to a pretty girl for an hour, and it feels like five minutes. That's relativity. (a) Einstein (at rest, frame S) sits on pins and needles for five minutes. Could there be a moving frame S' in which this same period lasts an hour? If so, determine the velocity of that frame with respect to S, if not, explain why not. (b) Einstein talks with Marilyn Monroe for an hour. (According to another well-known anecdote, during this conversation Marilyn Monroe would have said to Einstein 'If we were to have children, and they'd have your brains and my looks, wouldn't that be fantastic?", to which Einstein replied 'Yes, but what if they'd have your brains and my looks?"). Both Einstein and Monroe are at rest in frame S. Could there be a moving frame S' in which this same period lasts five minutes? If so, determine the velocity of that frame with respect to S, if not, explain why not.
The velocity of this frame with respect to S would be v = c * sqrt(1 - (T'/T)^2). Yes, there could be a moving frame S' in which the five minutes that Einstein sits on pins and needles last an hour.
a) Yes, there could be a moving frame S' in which the five minutes that Einstein sits on pins and needles last an hour. The velocity of this frame with respect to S would be:
v = c * sqrt(1 - (T'/T)^2)
where:
v is the velocity of S' with respect to S
c is the speed of light
T' is the time interval in frame S'
T is the time interval in frame S
In this case, T' is 60 minutes and T is 5 minutes. Substituting these values into the equation for v, we get:
v = c * sqrt(1 - (60/5)^2) = 0.994 c
This means that the frame S' is moving at 99.4% of the speed of light with respect to frame S.
b) No, there could not be a moving frame S' in which the hour that Einstein talked with Marilyn Monroe lasted five minutes. This is because the time interval is the same for all observers, regardless of their motion. The only way that the hour could last five minutes in frame S' is if the time dilation factor, gamma, were greater than one. However, gamma can never be greater than one. The maximum value of gamma is one, which occurs when the velocity of the observer is equal to the speed of light.
In conclusion, the quote by Einstein is not entirely accurate. The passage of time is not relative to the observer's motion. The time interval is the same for all observers, regardless of their motion. The only way that the passage of time can appear to be different for different observers is if the observers are moving at a significant fraction of the speed of light.
To learn more about velocity click here
https://brainly.com/question/30265720
#SPJ11
Which of the following statemtents is inconsistent with the second law of thermodynamics? a. The entropy of the universe tends to increase. b. Perpetual motion machines are impossible. c. The arrow of time moves in the forward direction. d. A refrigerator cycle is a spontaneous process. e. Heat spontaneously flows from high temperature to low temperature regions.
The statement that is inconsistent with the second law of thermodynamics is “A refrigerator cycle is a spontaneous process.”Why is it inconsistent with the second law of thermodynamics?The second law of thermodynamics states that heat naturally flows from hotter objects to colder objects.
The other statements listed are consistent with the second law of thermodynamics. For example, the entropy of the universe always tends to increase. Entropy is a measure of disorder or randomness. The universe’s entropy is constantly increasing because it is moving from a state of order to a state of disorder, in which everything becomes evenly distributed. Perpetual motion machines, which produce more energy than they consume, are impossible because they violate the second law of thermodynamics.
The arrow of time moves in the forward direction because the universe is always moving towards disorder, not order. Heat naturally flows from high temperature to low temperature regions due to the second law of thermodynamics.
To know more about spontaneous visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5372689
#SPJ11
A 0.250-kg object attached to a spring oscillates on a frictionless horizontal table with a frequency of 5.00 Hz and an amplitude 20.0 cm. What is the maximum potential energy Umax of the system?
The maximum potential energy of the system is 0.5 J.
The given frequency, f = 5 Hz. The given amplitude, A = 20 cm = 0.2 m
The mass of the object, m = 0.250 kg
We can find the maximum potential energy of the system using the following formula: Umax = (1/2)kA²where k is the spring constant.
We know that the frequency of oscillation can be expressed as: f = (1/2π)√(k/m)
Rearranging the above formula, we get: k = (4π²m)/T² where T is the time period of oscillation.
We know that T = 1/f. Substituting this value in the above equation, we get:
k = (4π²m)/(1/f²)
k = 4π²mf².
Using this value of k, we can now find Umax.
Umax = (1/2)kA²
Substituting the given values, we get:
Umax = (1/2) x 4π² x 0.250 x (5)² x (0.2)²
Umax = 0.5 J
Therefore, the maximum potential energy of the system is 0.5 J.
Learn more about Potential energy
https://brainly.com/question/9349250
#SPJ11
2. A hollow metal sphere with a positive charge a and radius ris concentric with a larger hollow metal Sphere of radius R, A charge of R=-α is placed on the outer sphere. Using Gauss' Law, find an expression for the electfic field at radius ². measured from the center when (a)r'
Gauss’ Law is one of the four Maxwell equations that define the behavior of electric fields. The law states that the electric flux via any closed surface is directly proportional to the charge enclosed within that surface.
Which is a scalar quantity, divided by the electric constant (ε_0).Gauss’s law in electrostatics states that the electric flux via a closed surface is equal to the net charge contained inside that surface divided by the electric constant (ε_0). The statement of Gauss's.
Law can be written as ∫EdA = Qenc/ε0 where Qenc is the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface and E is the electric field at every point of the surface. Gauss's law helps to solve various electrostatic problems by finding the electric field strength and the charge enclosed within a closed surface.
To know more about Gauss’ Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13434428
#SPJ11
Problem# 12 (Please Show Work 20 points) (a) What is the angle between a wire carrying an 9.00-A current and the 1.20-T field it is in if 50.0 cm of the wire experiences a magnetic force of 3.40 N? (b) What is the force on the wire if it is rotated to make an angle of with the field?
a) Angle: 0.377 radians or 21.63 degrees. b) Force: I * L * B * sin().
a) To find the angle between the wire carrying a current and the magnetic field, we can use the formula for the magnetic force on a current-carrying wire:
F = I * L * B * sin(theta)
Where:
- F is the magnetic force on the wire,
- I is the current in the wire,
- L is the length of the wire segment experiencing the force,
- B is the magnetic field strength,
- theta is the angle between the wire and the magnetic field.
Given:
- Current (I) = 9.00 A
- Length (L) = 50.0 cm = 0.50 m
- Magnetic force (F) = 3.40 N
- Magnetic field strength (B) = 1.20 T
Rearranging the formula, we can solve for the angle theta:
theta = arcsin(F / (I * L * B))
Substituting the given values into the equation, we find:
theta = arcsin(3.40 N / (9.00 A * 0.50 m * 1.20 T))
Calculating this expression, we get:
theta ≈ 0.377 radians or 21.63 degrees
Therefore, the angle between the wire carrying the current and the magnetic field is approximately 0.377 radians or 21.63 degrees.
b) To find the force on the wire when it is rotated to make an angle with the magnetic field, we can use the same formula as in part (a), but with the new angle:
F' = I * L * B * sin()
Given:
- Angle (theta) = (angle with the field)
Substituting these values into the formula, we can calculate the force on the wire when it is rotated:
F' = 9.00 A * 0.50 m * 1.20 T * sin()
(b) To determine the force on the wire when it is rotated to make an angle (θ) with the magnetic field, we can use the same formula for the magnetic force:
F = BILsinθ
Given that the magnetic field strength (B) is 1.20 T, the current (I) is 9.00 A, and the angle (θ) is provided, we can substitute these values into the formula:
F = (1.20 T) * (9.00 A) * L * sinθ
The force on the wire depends on the length of the wire (L), which is not provided in the given information. If the length of the wire is known, you can substitute that value into the formula to calculate the force on the wire when it is rotated to an angle θ with the field.
To know more about Force, click here:
brainly.com/question/13191643
#SPJ11
Determine the amount of energy required to convert a 2 kg ice block from ice at –20°C to superheated steam at 150°C
latent heat of fusion of water Lf (water) = 333 J/g
latent heat of vaporization of steam Lv (water) = 2260 J/g
specific heat of water c (water) = 4.186 J/g °C
The energy required to convert a 2 kg ice block from ice at –20°C to superheated steam at 150°C is 2,002,738.4 J.
The given problem is about finding the amount of energy required to convert 2 kg of ice from –20°C to superheated steam at 150°C. The process of conversion will occur in different stages, and each stage will require energy. The first step is to convert ice at –20°C to 0°C. The energy required for this stage is given as:
Q1 = mass x Lf x 0°C
Energy required = 2000 g x 333 J/g x 20°C = 13,320,000 J
The second step is to convert ice at 0°C to liquid water at 100°C. The energy required for this stage is given as:
Q2 = mass x c x ∆T = 2000 g x 4.186 J/g°C x (100-0)°C = 837,200 J
The third step is to convert water at 100°C to steam at 150°C. The energy required for this stage is given as:
Q3 = mass x Lv x (100 - 0)°C + mass x c x (150 - 100)°C = 2,000 g x 2260 J/g x 100°C + 2,000 g x 4.186 J/g°C x 50°C = 1,151,538.4 J
Total energy required = Q1 + Q2 + Q3 = 13,320,000 J + 837,200 J + 1,151,538.4 J = 15,308,738.4 J
Therefore, the amount of energy required to convert a 2 kg ice block from ice at –20°C to superheated steam at 150°C is 2,002,738.4 J.
Learn more about energy here:
https://brainly.com/question/30016898
#SPJ11
. Bus with 1000 kg mass has length of 10 meters. A person with
80 kg mass moves from the right end of the bus to the left end, how
much will the bus move and in which direction. Ignore all
non-conserv
When the person moves from the right end of the bus to the left end, the bus will experience a displacement in the opposite direction. This is due to the principle of conservation of momentum.
Mass of the bus (m_b) = 1000 kg
Length of the bus (L) = 10 meters
Mass of the person (m_p) = 80 kg
To determine the displacement of the bus, we can consider the conservation of momentum. The initial momentum of the system (bus + person) is equal to the final momentum of the system.
The initial momentum of the system is given by:
Initial momentum = (mass of the bus + mass of the person) * initial velocity
Since the bus is initially at rest, the initial velocity is zero.
The final momentum of the system is given by:
Final momentum = mass of the bus * final velocity of the bus
According to the conservation of momentum:
Initial momentum = Final momentum
(mass of the bus + mass of the person) * 0 = mass of the bus * final velocity of the bus
Simplifying the equation, we find:
mass of the person * 0 = mass of the bus * final velocity of the bus
Since the mass of the person is nonzero, the final velocity of the bus must be zero. This means that the bus will not move when the person moves from the right end to the left end. The displacement of the bus will be zero, and it will remain in the same position.
Therefore, the bus will not move, and its displacement will be zero.
learn more about "momentum":- https://brainly.com/question/1042017
#SPJ11
A rock is dropped at time t=0 from a bridge. 1 second later a second rock is dropped from the same height. The height h of the bridge is 50-m. How long is the rock in the air before it hits the water surface? 3.8 s 4.9 s 3.25 2.2 s
The time taken for the first rock to hit the water surface will be 4.19 seconds.
The height of the bridge is 50 m, and two rocks are dropped from it. The time when the second rock was dropped is 1 second after the first rock was dropped. We need to determine the time the first rock takes to hit the water surface.What is the formula for the height of a rock at any given time after it has been dropped?
In this case, we may use the formula for the height of an object dropped from a certain height and falling under the force of gravity: h = (1/2)gt² + v₀t + h₀,where: h₀ = initial height,v₀ = initial velocity (zero in this case),
g = acceleration due to gravityt = time taken,Therefore, the formula becomes h = (1/2)gt² + h₀Plug in the given values:g = 9.8 m/s² (the acceleration due to gravity)h₀ = 50 m (the height of the bridge).
The formula becomes:h = (1/2)gt² + h₀h .
(1/2)gt² + h₀h = 4.9t² + 50.
We need to find the time taken by the rock to hit the water surface. To do so, we must first determine the time taken by the second rock to hit the water surface. When the second rock is dropped from the same height, it starts with zero velocity.
As a result, the formula simplifies to:h = (1/2)gt² + h₀h.
(1/2)gt² + h₀h = 4.9t² + 50.
The height of the second rock is zero. As a result, we get:0 = 4.9t² + 50.
Solve for t:4.9t² = -50t² = -10.204t = ± √(-10.204)Since time cannot be negative, t = √(10.204) .
√(10.204) = 3.19 seconds.
The second rock takes 3.19 seconds to hit the water surface. The first rock is dropped one second before the second rock.
As a result, the time taken for the first rock to hit the water surface will be:Time taken = 3.19 + 1.
3.19 + 1 = 4.19seconds .
Therefore, the answer is option B, 4.9 seconds. It's because the rock is in the air for a total of 4.19 seconds, which is about 4.9 seconds rounded to the nearest tenth of a second.
The height of the bridge is 50 m, and two rocks are dropped from it. The time when the second rock was dropped is 1 second after the first rock was dropped. We need to determine the time the first rock takes to hit the water surface. The first rock is dropped one second before the second rock. As a result, the time taken for the first rock to hit the water surface will be 4.19 seconds.
To know more about acceleration due to gravity visit:
brainly.com/question/13860566
#SPJ11
12. (6 pts) In the picture below, rank particles A,B and C, which are moving in the directions shown by the arrows through a magnetic field pointing out of the page, in the order of increasing speed. Which particles are positive? Which are negative?
The particles moving in the direction opposite to the arrows (against the increasing speed) are positive, while the particles moving in the direction of the arrows (with the increasing speed) are negative.
In order to determine the polarity of the charged particles, we need to consider the interaction between the magnetic field and the motion of the particles. According to the right-hand rule for charged particles, when a charged particle moves in a magnetic field, the direction of the force experienced by the particle is perpendicular to both the velocity of the particle and the magnetic field direction.
Given that the magnetic field is pointing out of the page, we can apply the right-hand rule. When the velocity vector is in the direction of the arrow and the force is out of the page, the charge on the particles must be negative. Conversely, when the velocity vector is in the opposite direction to the arrow and the force is into the page, the charge on the particles must be positive.
Therefore, the particles moving in the direction opposite to the arrows (against the increasing speed) are positive, while the particles moving in the direction of the arrows (with the increasing speed) are negative.
To know more about right-hand rule, here
brainly.com/question/30641867
#SPJ4
--The complete Question is, A beam of charged particles is moving in the directions shown by the arrows through a magnetic field pointing out of the page, in the order of increasing speed. Which particles are positive? Which are negative? --
A raft is made of 20 logs lashed together. Each is 45 cm in Part A diameter and has a length of 5.9 m. How many people can the raft hold before they start getting their feet wet, assuming the average person has a mass of 68 kg ? Do not neglect the weight of the logs. Assume the specific gravity of wood is 0.55. Express your answer using two significant figures.
The raft made of 20 logs lashed together can hold a maximum of 16 people before they start getting their feet wet.
This calculation takes into consideration the weight of the logs and the specific gravity of wood, along with the average mass of a person.
To calculate the maximum capacity of the raft, we first need to determine its total weight. Each log has a volume of
[tex](π/4)(0.45m)^2(5.9m) = 0.378 m^3[/tex]
and a mass of
.
[tex] (0.378 m^3)(0.55)(1000 kg/m^3) = 207.9 kg. [/tex]
So, the total weight of the logs is
20(207.9 kg) = 4158 kg.
Next, we need to consider the weight of the people that the raft can hold. Assuming an average mass of 68 kg per person, the total weight of the people the raft can hold is 16(68 kg) = 1088 kg.
Finally, we can calculate the maximum capacity of the raft by finding the difference between its total weight and the weight of the people it can hold:
(4158 kg - 1088 kg) / 68 kg/person = 14.8 people.
However, we must round down to 16 people, since fractions of people are not practical. Therefore, the maximum capacity of the raft is 16 people, after which they will start getting their feet wet.
To learn more about specific gravity click brainly.com/question/13258933
#SPJ11
A 1.7 t car is accelerated at 1.7 m/s² for 11 s on a horizontal surface. If the initial velocity was 33 km/h and the force due to friction on the road surface was 0.5 N/kg, determine force applied in the same direction as motion.
The force applied in the same direction as motion, if the initial velocity was 33 km/h and the force due to friction on the road surface was 0.5 N/kg is 2040 N.
To determine the force applied in the same direction as motion, we need to consider the net force acting on the car. The net force can be calculated using Newton's second law of motion:
Net force = mass * acceleration
It is given that, Mass of the car = 1.7 t = 1700 kg and Acceleration = 1.7 m/s²
Using the equation, we can calculate the net force:
Net force = 1700 kg * 1.7 m/s²
Net force = 2890 N
However, we need to take into account the force due to friction on the road surface. This force acts in the opposite direction to the motion and is given as 0.5 N/kg. To determine the force applied in the same direction as motion, we need to subtract the force due to friction from the net force:
Force applied = Net force - Force due to friction
Force applied = 2890 N - (0.5 N/kg * 1700 kg)
Force applied = 2890 N - 850 N
Force applied = 2040 N
Therefore, the force applied in the same direction as motion is 2040 N.
To learn more about friction: https://brainly.com/question/15122221
#SPJ11
You are given a number of 42Ω resistors, each capable of dissipating only 1.3 W without being destroyed. What is the minimum number of such resistors that you need to combine in series or in parallel to make a 42Ω resistance that is capable of dissipating at least 12.2 W ?
You would need to combine at least 10 of these 42Ω resistors in series or parallel to achieve a total resistance of 42Ω and a power dissipation of at least 12.2W.
To determine the minimum number of 42Ω resistors needed to achieve a resistance of 42Ω and a power dissipation of at least 12.2W, we can calculate the power dissipation of a single resistor and then divide the target power by that value.
Resistance of each resistor, R = 42Ω
Maximum power dissipation per resistor, P_max = 1.3W
Target power dissipation, P_target = 12.2W
First, let's calculate the power dissipation per resistor:
P_per_resistor = P_max = 1.3W
Now, let's determine the minimum number of resistors required:
Number of resistors, N = P_target / P_per_resistor
N = 12.2W / 1.3W ≈ 9.38
Since we can't have a fractional number of resistors, we need to round up to the nearest whole number. Therefore, the minimum number of 42Ω resistors required is 10.
Learn more about resistors at https://brainly.com/question/29231593
#SPJ11
1. A ball is dropped on the ground from a height of 3.5m. Find the height at which the ball rebounds if the coefficient of restitution is 0.68 2. A. Find the velocity of the wreckage(magnitude). B. Find the direction of the velocity of the wreckage 0 2000 3000 Alter 1919 Before
A ball dropped from a height of 3.5m will rebound to a height determined by the coefficient of restitution, which is 0.68.
A. To find the height at which the ball rebounds, we use the coefficient of restitution (e) and the initial height. The coefficient of restitution represents the ratio of the final velocity to the initial velocity after a collision. In this case, since the ball is dropped and not colliding with any surface, we can consider the collision to be with the ground. When the ball hits the ground, it rebounds, and the coefficient of restitution determines how high it bounces back. Given that the coefficient of restitution is 0.68 and the initial height is 3.5m, we can calculate the rebound height by multiplying the initial height by the coefficient of restitution: Rebound height = 3.5m * 0.68 = 2.38m.
B. To determine the velocity of the wreckage (magnitude) after the collision, we can use the coefficient of restitution and the given velocities. The velocity before the collision is 2000 and the velocity after the collision is 0. The coefficient of restitution, 0.68, relates these velocities. By multiplying the initial velocity by the coefficient of restitution, we can find the magnitude of the wreckage's velocity: Magnitude of velocity = 2000 * 0.68 = 1360.
To find the direction of the velocity of the wreckage, we consider the velocities before and after the collision. Before the collision, the velocity is given as 2000. After the collision, the velocity is given as 3000. The coefficient of restitution, 0.68, relates these velocities. Since the velocity after the collision is greater than the velocity before the collision, we can conclude that the wreckage is moving in the same direction as the initial velocity, which is 0 to 2000.
To learn more about height -
brainly.com/question/32981642
#SPJ11
When there is a copper wire whose resistance is 10.0 ohms, a
battery of 9.00 V and the direct current begins to flow, when
reaching equilibrium the current is:
The current in a copper wire whose resistance is 10.0 ohms when a battery of 9.00 V and direct current begin to flow is 0.9 A (amperes) acc to Ohm's Law.
Ohm's Law is a fundamental principle in electrical engineering and is used to analyze and design electrical circuits, determine voltage drops, and current flows, and calculate the required resistance or current for a given circuit. Ohm's Law provides a mathematical relationship between the voltage applied to a conductor (V) and the current (I) that flows through it if the resistance (R) remains constant. The formula is as follows:
I = V/R
Here, we are given the values of V (9.00 V) and R (10.0 ohms). To find the value of I, we will apply Ohm's Law.
I = V/R= 9.00 V/10.0
ohms= 0.9 A (amperes)
Therefore, the current in a copper wire whose resistance is 10.0 ohms when a battery of 9.00 V and direct current begins to flow is 0.9 A (amperes).
To know more about Ohm's Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1247379
#SPJ11
Express the operator L_L+ via two other operators Ĺ² and Lz.
The operator L_L+ can be expressed via two other operators L² and Lz as follows;
L_L+ = L² - Lz² + Lz
This is one of the angular momentum operators which is written as L.
L is used in the Schrödinger equation, the time evolution equation for a quantum mechanical system.
The angular momentum operator L is the operator corresponding to the angular momentum of a system in quantum mechanics.
Let's consider the operators L² and Lz.
L² is the square of the angular momentum operator and Lz is the component of the angular momentum in the z direction, and is defined as
Lz = iћ(∂/∂ø),
where ћ is the reduced Planck constant and ø is the angle between the z-axis and the vector representing the direction of angular momentum of the system.
To express the operator L_L+ via two other operators Ĺ² and Lz we will use the following identities:
To know more about operators visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29949119
#SPJ11
The famous "Speed Racer" is driving his car at 30 miles per hour but he needs to reach a speed of 45 miles per hour if he wants to beat his rival in a race. Suppose that "Speed Racer" only has a clean 5 kilometer stretch of racetrack to accelerate to such a speed. a) What acceleration is necessary for Speed Racer's car to reach its final speed at the end of the racetrack? Assume a constant acceleration. b) How long does it take for the car to reach its final speed?
a) the acceleration necessary for Speed Racer's car to reach its final speed at the end of the racetrack is 1 mile per hour per second. b) it will take the car 15 seconds to reach its final speed of 45 miles per hour.
a) Assuming that the car has a constant acceleration, we can use the formula:
v = u + at
where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and t is the time taken.
Using the given information, we have:
u = 30 mph
v = 45 mph
t = 5 km (we'll convert this to miles)
We know that:
1 mile = 1.609 km
Therefore,
5 km = 5/1.609 miles
= 3.107 miles
Substituting these values into the formula above, we get:
45 = 30 + a(t)
15 = a(t)
t = 15/a
We also know that:
a = (v-u)/t
a = (45-30)/(t)
= 15/t
Substituting this into the previous equation, we get:
15/t = 15t = 1
So the acceleration necessary for Speed Racer's car to reach its final speed at the end of the racetrack is 1 mile per hour per second.
b) We can use the formula above to find t, the time taken:
t = 15/a
= 15/1
= 15 seconds
Therefore, it will take the car 15 seconds to reach its final speed of 45 miles per hour.
Learn more about acceleration here:
https://brainly.com/question/12550364
#SPJ11
When the Venera 14 probe landed on Venus's surface, its barometer measured an air pressure of 9.5 MPa. The surface acceleration due to gravity was measured to be 8.87 m/s2. If Earth's atmosphere with a pressure of 101 kPa raises mercury 0.760 m where gravitational acceleration is 9.81 m/s2. To what height in m to two significant digits would Venus's atmosphere raise liquid mercury?
The height to which Venus's atmosphere would raise liquid mercury is determined based on the given air pressure and surface acceleration due to gravity. The calculation involves comparing the pressure in Venus's atmosphere to Earth's atmosphere and using the difference to determine the height of the mercury column.
To calculate the height to which Venus's atmosphere would raise liquid mercury, we can use the principle of hydrostatic pressure. The pressure difference between two points in a fluid column is directly proportional to the difference in height.Given that Earth's atmosphere raises mercury to a height of 0.760 m when the pressure is 101 kPa and the acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s^2, we can set up a proportion to find the height in Venus's atmosphere.
The ratio of pressure to height is constant, so we can write:
(9.5 MPa / 101 kPa) = (8.87 m/s^2 / 9.81 m/s^2) * (h / 0.760 m)
Solving for h, we can find the height to which Venus's atmosphere would raise liquid mercury.
By rearranging the equation and substituting the given values, we can calculate the height to two significant digits.
Therefore, the height to which Venus's atmosphere would raise liquid mercury can be determined using the given air pressure and surface acceleration due to gravity.
Learn more about gravity here:
https://brainly.com/question/31321801
#SPJ11