A city currently has 2.08 thousand residents. Each year the city's population grows by around 420 persons.

After 14 years what will the approximate population of the city be? Round to three significant digits.

Approximately
thousand residents.

Answer:

99

Step-by-step explanation:

since the height is 9 and the base is 11 we use the formula BH=V

substitute 9x11 and get 99

(i) R is not reflexive, symmetric, vacuously antisymmetric, and not transitive.

(ii)  It is important that S has at least two different elements because if S had only one element, then the power set P(S) would contain only two sets: the empty set and the set S itself.  

(iii)  If S was empty, there would be no elements in S, and hence the power set P(S) would only contain the empty set. The answers regarding reflexivity, symmetry, antisymmetry, and transitivity would all change, and the relation R would not possess any of these properties. If S had only one element, the power set P(S) would contain two sets: the empty set and the singleton set containing the one element of S. The relation R would be reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and transitive, as it satisfies all these properties by definition.

(i)Let's analyze the properties of relation R on P(S):

Reflexive: A relation R is reflexive if for every element x in the set S, (x, x) belongs to R. In this case, since the intersection of any set with itself is never empty, the relation R is not reflexive.

Symmetric: A relation R is symmetric if for every pair (x, y) in R, (y, x) also belongs to R. In this case, since the intersection of two sets is commutative, if (X, Y) belongs to R, then (Y, X) also belongs to R. Thus, the relation R is symmetric.

Antisymmetric: A relation R is antisymmetric if for every distinct pair (x, y) in R, (y, x) does not belong to R. Since the relation R is defined by the condition X∩Y = φ, there are no distinct pairs (X, Y) that satisfy the condition. Therefore, the relation R is vacuously antisymmetric.

Transitive: A relation R is transitive if for every three sets X, Y, and Z such that (X, Y) belongs to R and (Y, Z) belongs to R, then (X, Z) also belongs to R. In this case, if X∩Y = φ and Y∩Z = φ, it does not imply that X∩Z = φ. Hence, the relation R is not transitive.

(ii) In this scenario, the relation R would not have any pairs (X, Y) where X and Y are non-empty subsets of S, because the intersection of any two non-empty subsets would never be empty. Thus, the relation R would be trivial and uninteresting.

(iii) In this case, since there are no non-empty subsets in P(S), the relation R would not have any pairs (X, Y) where X and Y are non-empty subsets of S.

In this case, the relation R would have only one possible pair (X, Y) with X and Y being the empty set, and their intersection would indeed be empty.

For more such questions on symmetry

https://brainly.com/question/20168388

#SPJ8

Based on the analysis, the graph that represents the statement "y is greater than two less than the product of x and three" is Option C.

To determine which graph represents the statement "y is greater than two less than the product of x and three," we need to analyze the given options and match them with the statement.

The statement "y is greater than two less than the product of x and three" can be represented mathematically as:

y > 2 - 3x

Now let's examine the given graphs and compare them to the equation:

Option A: This graph shows a horizontal line at y = 2. It does not involve any product of x and three, so it does not match the given statement.

Option B: This graph shows a line with a positive slope passing through the point (0, 2). While it includes the product of x and three, it does not satisfy the condition of "y is greater than two less than the product of x and three." Therefore, it does not represent the given statement.

Option C: This graph shows a line with a positive slope passing through the point (0, 2) and includes the region above the line y = 3x - 2. This region satisfies the condition of "y is greater than two less than the product of x and three." Therefore, Option C represents the given statement.

Option D: This graph shows a horizontal line at y = -2. It does not match the given statement.

Option C is correct.

For more such questions on graph visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19040584

#SPJ8

Note: This is the final question on search engine

Answer:

∠ NPQ = 120°

Step-by-step explanation:

the central angle NPQ is twice the angle on the circle NRQ , subtended by the same arc NQ , then

∠ NPQ = 2 × 60° = 120°

Answer:

x ≈ 77.79 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

using the sine ratio in the right triangle

sin40° = [tex]\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{50}{x}[/tex] ( multiply both sides by x )

x × sin40° = 50 ( divide both sides by sin40° )

x = [tex]\frac{50}{sin40}[/tex] ≈ 77.79 ft ( to the nearest hundredth )

The required answers of the given questions are answered below.

a), b), c),  d)

A quadrilateral is geometric structure enclosed in 4 sides.

A) Because,

 1) the angle A = Angle D

 2) its has a common side

 3) the angle D = Angle B

 ∵ ΔEAB ≅ EDC

Thus, Both the triangle is congruent by ASA.

B.)

Jane conclusion is also write for AAA

because by angle E is congruent to angle B, implies angle F is congruent to angle C.

So that is why Jane conclude AAA.

C.) George conclusion is also perfect

George thinks the following conditions-

1) the angle A = Angle D

 2) its has a common side

 3) the angle D = Angle B

 ∵ ΔEAB ≅ EDC

Thus, Both the triangle is congruent.

Hence, Both the triangles are congruent by SSS.

Learn more about the quadrilateral at:

https://brainly.com/question/29934440

Answer: Therefore, the perimeter of the soccer field is 332 meters.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine the perimeter of a soccer field with a length of 97 meters and a width of 69 meters, we can use the formula for the perimeter of a rectangle, which is given by:

Perimeter = 2 * (length + width)

Plugging in the values, we have:

Perimeter = 2 * (97 + 69)

Perimeter = 2 * 166

Perimeter = 332 meters

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve these problems, we can use the Poisson probability formula:

P(x; λ) = (e^(-λ) * λ^x) / x!

Where:

P(x; λ) is the probability of x events occurring

e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828)

λ is the average rate of events occurring in the given time period

x is the number of events

(a) Probability of exactly 4 orders arriving in 30 minutes:

The average rate of orders is given as 5 orders per hour. To find the average rate of orders in 30 minutes, we divide it by 2 (since 30 minutes is half an hour):

λ = 5 orders/hour / 2 = 2.5 orders/30 minutes

Using the Poisson probability formula:

P(x = 4; λ = 2.5) = (e^(-2.5) * 2.5^4) / 4!

Calculating this:

P(x = 4; λ = 2.5) ≈ (0.082 * 39.0625) / 24

P(x = 4; λ = 2.5) ≈ 3.22265625 / 24

P(x = 4; λ = 2.5) ≈ 0.134

Therefore, the probability that exactly 4 orders will arrive in 30 minutes is approximately 0.134, or 13.4%.

(b) Probability of at least 2 orders arriving in an hour:

To find the probability of at least 2 orders, we need to calculate the probabilities of having 0 and 1 order and subtract it from 1 (since it's the complement).

Using the Poisson probability formula:

P(x = 0; λ = 5) = (e^(-5) * 5^0) / 0! = e^(-5) ≈ 0.0067

P(x = 1; λ = 5) = (e^(-5) * 5^1) / 1! ≈ 0.0337

P(at least 2 orders) = 1 - P(x = 0) - P(x = 1) ≈ 1 - 0.0067 - 0.0337 ≈ 0.9596

Therefore, the probability of at least 2 orders arriving in an hour is approximately 0.9596, or 95.96%.

The triangles DEF and SRQ are not similar triangles

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The triangles in this figure are

DEF and SRQ

These triangles are not similar

This is because:

The corresponding angles in the triangles are not equal

For DEF, the angles are

50, 90 and 40

For SRQ, the angles are

51, 90 and 39

This means that they are not similar by any similarity statement

Read mroe about similar triangles at

brainly.com/question/31898026

#SPJ1

I agree with both Priya's and Han's equations.

To determine if either Priya or Han equation is correct, we can substitute the coordinates of the given point (1,2) into each equation and check if the equation holds true.

For Priya's equation, y - 2 = (1/3)(x - 1), substituting x = 1 and y = 2:

2 - 2 = (1/3)(1 - 1)

0 = 0

The equation holds true, so Priya's equation is correct.

For Han's equation, 3y - x = 5, substituting x = 1 and y = 2:

3(2) - 1 = 5

6 - 1 = 5

5 = 5

The equation also holds true, so Han's equation is correct.

Both Priya's and Han's equations are valid equations of the line with a slope of 1/3 passing through the point (1,2). The equations have different forms, but they are algebraically equivalent and represent the same line. Therefore, I agree with both Priya's and Han's equations.

For more questions on coordinates, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/31293074

#SPJ8

Answer: 0.3464 (correct upto 4 decimal places )

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\sqrt{3/25}[/tex]= [tex]\sqrt{3} /\sqrt{25\\}[/tex]     (as the square root of 25 is 5)

=1.73205/5

=0.3464

In general form, the equation 2x^2 - 4x + 6 = 1 can be represented as A = 2, B = -4, and C = 5.

To determine the values of A, B, and C in the general form of the quadratic equation 2x^2 - 4x + 6 = 1, we can compare the given equation with the standard form of a quadratic equation, which is ax^2 + bx + c = 0.

In the given equation, we have:

2x^2 - 4x + 6 = 1

To put it in the general form, we need to move all the terms to the left side of the equation, so the right side is equal to 0:

2x^2 - 4x + 6 - 1 = 0

2x^2 - 4x + 5 = 0

Now we can identify the coefficients A, B, and C in the general form:

A = 2 (coefficient of x^2)

B = -4 (coefficient of x)

C = 5 (constant term)

The values of A, B, and C in the general form of the equation 2x^2 - 4x + 6 = 1 are A = 2, B = -4, and C = 5.

for such more question on general form

https://brainly.com/question/27746495

#SPJ8

Answer:

The number is 16

Step-by-step explanation:

This follows a multiplication rule,

4 times 1 = 4

4 times 2 = 8

4 times 3 = 12

4 times 4 = 16

So, the number is 16

Hello!

Volume

= (18cm * 15cm * 6cm) + ((13cm - 6cm) * 15cm * 6cm)

= 1,620cm³ + 630cm³

= 2,250cm³

Answer:

[tex]y=\boxed{2}\:\cos \left(\boxed{1}\;x\right)+\boxed{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph of the solid black line is the cosine parent function, y = cos(x).

The standard form of a cosine function is:

[tex]\boxed{y = A \cos(B(x + C)) + D}[/tex]

where:

From inspection of the graph, the x-values of the turning points (peaks and troughs) of the parent function and the new function are the same. Therefore, the period of both functions is the same, and there has been no horizontal shift. So, B = 1 and C = 0.

The mid-line of the new function is y = 3. Therefore, D = 3.

The y-value of the peaks is y = 5. The amplitude is the distance from the mid-line to the peak. Therefore, A = 2.

Substituting these values into the standard formula we get:

[tex]y = 2 \cos(1(x + 0)) + 3[/tex]

[tex]y=2 \cos (1(x))+3[/tex]

[tex]y= 2 \cos(x) + 3[/tex]

Therefore, the equation of the trigonometric graph is:

[tex]y=\boxed{2}\:\cos \left(\boxed{1}\;x\right)+\boxed{3}[/tex]

Answer:

A) [tex]\displaystyle y=\left \{ {{x^3-4,\,x\leq 1} \atop {x^2-3,\,x > 1}} \right.[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The first "piece" of the piecewise function, [tex]y=x^3-4[/tex], contains [tex]x=1[/tex] because of the closed dot there.

The second "piece" of the piecewise function, [tex]y=x^2-3[/tex], doesn't contain [tex]x=1[/tex] because of the open dot there.

What occurs between the two pieces is called a jump discontinuity.

Therefore, A is the correct answer.

Answer:

a) r = .1880

b) a = .1186

c) r² = .0353

d) b = 3.6780

Answer:

(-13, -9) and (-5, -9)

Step-by-step explanation:

The given equation of the hyperbola is:

[tex]\dfrac{(y+9)^2}{25}-\dfrac{(x+9)^2}{16}=1[/tex]

As the y²-term of the given equation is positive, the transverse axis is vertical, and so the hyperbola is vertical (opens up and down).

The standard equation for a vertical hyperbola is:

[tex]\boxed{\dfrac{(y-k)^2}{a^2}-\dfrac{(x-h)^2}{b^2}=1}[/tex]

where:

Compare the given equation with the standard equation to find the values of h, k, a and b:

The formula for the co-vertices of a vertical hyperbola is (h±b, k).

Substitute the values of b, h and k into the formula:

[tex]\begin{aligned}\textsf{Co-vertices}&=(h\pm b,k)\\&=(-9\pm 4, -9)\\&=(-13,-9)\;\;\textsf{and}\;\;(-5, -9)\end{aligned}[/tex]

Therefore, the co-vertices of the given hyperbola are:

The co-vertices of the hyperbola are (-4, -9) and (-14, -9).

To find the co-vertices of the hyperbola defined by the equation:

[(y + 9)² / 25] - [(x + 9)² / 16] = 1

We can compare the equation to the standard form of a hyperbola:

[(y - h)² / a²] - [(x - k)² / b²] = 1

In this case, we have h = -9 and k = -9.

The co-vertices of a hyperbola lie on the transverse axis, which is the line passing through the center of the hyperbola. The center of the hyperbola is given by (h, k), which in this case is (-9, -9).

For a hyperbola with the equation in this form, the co-vertices are located a units to the right and left of the center. In this case, since the equation is [(y + 9)² / 25] - [(x + 9)² / 16] = 1, we have a = 5.

Therefore, the co-vertices are located at (-9 ± a, -9), which gives us:

(-9 + 5, -9) = (-4, -9)

(-9 - 5, -9) = (-14, -9)

Learn more on co-vertices of hyperbola here;

https://brainly.com/question/15935373

#SPJ1

Answer:  Choice C.   [tex]\displaystyle \boldsymbol{-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{3}}[/tex]

===================================================

Work Shown:

Part 1

[tex]\sin^2(\theta)+\cos^2(\theta) = 1\\\\\cos^2(\theta) = 1-\sin^2(\theta)\\\\\cos(\theta) = -\sqrt{1-\sin^2(\theta)} \ \ \text{ ..... cosine is negative in Q2}\\\\\cos(\theta) = -\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^2}\\\\\\cos(\theta) = -\sqrt{1-\frac{4}{9}}\\\\[/tex]

Part 2

[tex]\cos(\theta) = -\sqrt{\frac{9}{9}-\frac{4}{9}}\\\\\cos(\theta) = -\sqrt{\frac{9-4}{9}}\\\\\cos(\theta) = -\sqrt{\frac{5}{9}}\\\\\cos(\theta) = -\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\sqrt{9}}\\\\\cos(\theta) = -\frac{\sqrt{5}}{3}\\\\[/tex]

Answer:

A acute angle is a angle that is less than 90*

To find an ordered pair that satisfies the given system of inequalities, we need to find a point that lies below the line y = -x - 3 and above the line y = 2x - 4.

One such point that satisfies both inequalities is (-1, 0).

Let's check if this point satisfies both inequalities:

For the first inequality, y < -x - 3:

0 < -(-1) - 3

0 < 1 - 3

0 < -2 (True)

For the second inequality, y > 2x - 4:

0 > 2(-1) - 4

0 > -2 - 4

0 > -6 (True)

Therefore, the ordered pair (-1, 0) satisfies the system of inequalities y < -x - 3 and y > 2x - 4.

The graph of the equation f(x) = 1/2x - 5 is the graph (b)

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

f(x) = 1/2x - 5

The above expression is a linear equation that implies that

Slope = 1/2

y-intercept = -5

Next, we determine the graph

The graph that has a slope of 1/2 and y-intercept of -5 is (b)

Read more about linear relation at

https://brainly.com/question/30318449

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

39 !!!!!

The nurse should administer 4 Lasix 20 mg tablets to the patient to achieve the prescribed dose of 80 mg.

To determine the number of Lasix 20 mg tablets that should be administered to the patient, we need to calculate how many tablets are equivalent to the prescribed dose of 80 mg.

Given that each Lasix tablet contains 20 mg of the medication, we can divide the prescribed dose (80 mg) by the dosage strength of each tablet (20 mg) to find the number of tablets needed.

Number of tablets = Prescribed dose / Dosage strength per tablet

Number of tablets = 80 mg / 20 mg

Number of tablets = 4 tablets

Therefore, the nurse should administer 4 Lasix 20 mg tablets to the patient to achieve the prescribed dose of 80 mg.

It is important to note that this calculation assumes that the Lasix tablets can be divided or split if necessary. However, it is crucial to follow the specific instructions provided by the prescribing physician or consult with a pharmacist if there are any concerns about the appropriate administration of the medication.

Additionally, it is important to consider any additional instructions, such as the frequency and timing of administration, as specified by the physician's order.

For more such questions on administer visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29458949

#SPJ8

The maximum area of a Norman window with a perimeter of 9 feet is 81π/4 square feet.

To find the maximum area of a Norman window with a given perimeter, we can use calculus. Let's denote the radius of the semicircle as r and the height of the rectangular window as h.The perimeter of the Norman window consists of the circumference of the semicircle and the sum of all four sides of the rectangular window. Therefore, we have the equation:

πr + 2h = 9We also know that the area of the Norman window is the sum of the area of the semicircle and the area of the rectangle, given by:

A = (πr^2)/2 + rh

To find the maximum area, we need to express the area function A in terms of a single variable. We can do this by substituting r from the perimeter equation:

r = (9 - 2h)/(π)

Now we can rewrite the area function in terms of h only:

A = (π/2) * ((9 - 2h)/(π))^2 + h * (9 - 2h)/(π)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

A = (1/2)(9h - h^2/π)

To find the maximum area, we differentiate the area function with respect to h, set it equal to zero, and solve for h:

dA/dh = 9/2 - h/π = 0

Solving this equation, we find:h = 9π/2

Substituting this value of h back into the area function, we get:

A = (1/2)(9 * 9π/2 - (9π/2)^2/π) = (81π/2 - 81π/4) = 81π/4

Therefore, the maximum area of a Norman window with a perimeter of 9 feet is 81π/4 square feet.

Learn more about area here:

https://brainly.com/question/2607596

#SPJ8

The parametric equation of the line passing through P1(2, 4, -3) and P(3, -1, 1) is:

x = 2 + t

y = 4 - 5t

z = -3 + 4t

To find the parametric equation of the line passing through points P1(2, 4, -3) and P(3, -1, 1), we can use the vector equation of a line.

Let's denote the direction vector of the line as d = (a, b, c). Since the line passes through P1 and P, the vector between these two points can be used as the direction vector.

d = P - P1 = (3, -1, 1) - (2, 4, -3) = (1, -5, 4)

Now, we can express the parametric equation of the line as follows:

x = x0 + at

y = y0 + bt

z = z0 + ct

where (x0, y0, z0) is a point on the line and (a, b, c) is the direction vector.

Let's choose P1(2, 4, -3) as the point on the line. Substituting the values, we get:

x = 2 + t

y = 4 - 5t

z = -3 + 4t

Therefore, the parametric equation of the line passing through P1(2, 4, -3) and P(3, -1, 1) is:

x = 2 + t

y = 4 - 5t

z = -3 + 4t

where t is a parameter that varies along the line.

for such more question on parametric equation

https://brainly.com/question/17482667

#SPJ8

Answer:

x = - 5 , x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = x² + 3x - 10

to find the zeros let f(x) = 0 , that is

x² + 3x - 10 = 0

consider the factors of the constant term (- 10) which sum to give the coefficient of the x- term (+ 3)

the factors are + 5 and - 2 , since

5 × - 2 = - 10 and 5 - 2 = + 3 , then

(x + 5)(x - 2) = 0 ← in factored form

equate each factor to zero and solve for x

x + 5 = 0 ( subtract 5 from both sides )

x = - 5

x - 2 = 0 ( add 2 to both sides )

x = 2

the zeros are x = - 5 , x = 2

Answer:

would this not be a converse statement?

Step-by-step explanation:

triangle ABC is the hypothesis and it's conclusion is triangle DEF

The Peterson family used their sprinkler for 30 hours, while the Stewart family used theirs for 15 hours.

Let's assume that the Peterson family used their sprinkler for a certain number of hours, which we'll denote as x, and the Stewart family used their sprinkler for the remaining hours, which would be 45 - x.

The water output rate for the Peterson family's sprinkler is given as 35 L per hour. Therefore, the total water output for the Peterson family can be calculated by multiplying the water output rate (35 L/h) by the number of hours they used the sprinkler (x): 35x.

Similarly, for the Stewart family, with a water output rate of 40 L per hour, the total water output for their sprinkler is given by 40(45 - x).

According to the problem, the combined total water output for both families is 1,650 L. Therefore, we can write the equation:

35x + 40(45 - x) = 1,650.

Simplifying the equation, we get:

35x + 1,800 - 40x = 1,650,

-5x = 1,650 - 1,800,

-5x = -150.

Dividing both sides of the equation by -5, we find:

x = -150 / -5 = 30.

So, the Peterson family used their sprinkler for 30 hours, and the Stewart family used theirs for 45 - 30 = 15 hours.

Therefore, the Peterson family used their sprinkler for 30 hours, while the Stewart family used theirs for 15 hours.

for more such question on hours visit

https://brainly.com/question/10929133

#SPJ8