The value of the interest tax shield for investors is approximately $20.36 million.
A. To calculate the value of the interest tax shield from the new debt, we need to multiply the amount of debt added ($154 million) by the corporate tax rate (21%).
Value of interest tax shield = Amount of debt added × Corporate tax rate
Value of interest tax shield = $154 million × 0.21
Value of interest tax shield = $32.34 million
Therefore, absent personal taxes, the value of the interest tax shield from the new debt is approximately $32.34 million.
B. To calculate the value of the interest tax shield for investors, we need to consider the tax rates on interest income, dividends, and capital gains. If investors pay a tax rate of 37% on interest income, and a tax rate of 20% on income from dividends and capital gains, we need to calculate the net benefit.
Net benefit = Value of interest tax shield × (1 - Tax rate on interest income)
Net benefit = $32.34 million × (1 - 0.37)
Net benefit = $32.34 million × 0.63
Net benefit = $20.36 million
Learn more about interest tax
https://brainly.com/question/24300581
#SPJ11
A customer who buys 1 abc jan 30 call and 1 abc jan 30 put would want the market to?
A customer who buys 1 ABC Jan 30 call and 1 ABC Jan 30 put would want the market to experience significant volatility.
When a customer buys both a call option and a put option with the same strike price and expiration date, it is known as a long straddle strategy. This strategy is used when the buyer expects a large move in the underlying stock price, but is uncertain about the direction of the move.
By purchasing the call option, the buyer has the right to buy the underlying stock at the strike price. This is profitable if the stock price rises significantly. On the other hand, by purchasing the put option, the buyer has the right to sell the underlying stock at the strike price. This is profitable if the stock price falls significantly.
Therefore, the buyer wants the market to experience significant volatility, where the stock price moves either up or down by a large amount. This would allow the buyer to profit from either the call or the put option, depending on the direction of the stock price movement.
In summary, a customer who buys a call and a put option would want the market to experience significant volatility in order to potentially profit from the options.
Learn more about volatility
https://brainly.com/question/30905318
#SPJ11
One of the main attractions of bitcoin is that there is a known maximum amount that can ever be produced. That means that bitcoin could work like an improved "gold standard". Discuss whether, on balance, it would be better to return to a gold (or bitcoin) standard, or keep the national fiat monies we are using today. If a lot of smaller countries (Canada, Nigeria, Pakistan, etc.) started using bitcoin, would big countries (the U.S, China, etc.) eventually have to do the same or not? WITH REFERENCES PLEASE WITH REFERENCES PLEASE
Since Bitcoin has a known maximum amount that can be produced, it can act like an improved "gold standard." Nonetheless, it's unclear whether it's better to go back to a gold (or bitcoin) standard or retain the national fiat monies we currently have.
The advantages of using bitcoin are still unknown. According to a study by the Bank of Finland, going back to a gold standard or switching to bitcoin would have significant economic consequences. The study discovered that returning to a gold standard would cause severe economic consequences, including deflation, since it would cause the money supply to shrink.
In contrast, adopting bitcoin as a national currency would not be feasible since the bitcoin network can handle fewer than ten transactions per second, whereas the Visa network can handle thousands of transactions per second. As a result, it is unlikely that bitcoin will ever be used as a national currency. Furthermore, central banks are likely to adopt digital currencies, which would be similar to national fiat currencies, but would be powered by blockchain technology.
As a result, we might expect that smaller countries like Canada, Nigeria, Pakistan, etc., may adopt digital currencies backed by blockchain technology, but it's unclear whether major countries like the U.S and China will do so as well .Reference: Bank of Finland: Bitcoin can't be compared to gold and the euro, but must be addressed PwC Legal: Is cryptocurrency the new gold rush?
To know more about blockchain technology visit :
https://brainly.com/question/31116390
#SPJ11
The cost of the machine is $14,730. The CCA rate is 22%. After 9 years, the machine is sold for $2,144 which is less than the UCC of the asset class. If there are other assets in the asset class, the discount rate is 9% and the tax rate is 36%, what is the present value of the CCA tax shield of this machine? (Assume 150%-rule)
The present value of the CCA tax shield of this machine is 1,204.23.
Given that, UCC of the machine at the end of 9th year = 14,730*(1-0.22)^9 = 1,166.57
As the sale price of 2,144 is less than the UCC of the asset class (1,166.57), a terminal loss will occur.
The amount of terminal loss = 2,144 - 1,166.57 = 977.43
The terminal loss will increase the CCA tax shield in the year of disposal.
The amount of tax saved due to terminal loss = 977.43 * 36% = 352.27.
We are given that the 150% rule applies here.The 150% rule allows the taxpayer to claim CCA on the UCC after the addition of 50% of the amount of the terminal loss.
So, UCC of the asset class for CCA purposes = 1,166.57 + 0.5*977.43 = 1,655.28
The CCA tax shield in the first year will be:22% * 1,655.28 = 364.16
Tax savings due to CCA = 364.16 * 36% = 131.10
We need to find the present value of these tax savings.
The formula to find the present value of an annuity due is given by:PV = [C/r] * [1 - (1 + r)^(-n)]
where,C = the cash flow in each period,r = the discount rate,n = the number of periods= 1 in our case.
PV = [131.10/0.09] * [1 - (1 + 0.09)^(-1)] = 1204.23
The present value of the CCA tax shield of this machine is 1,204.23 (rounded to two decimal places).
To know more about asset visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14826727
#SPJ11
For each of the following, indicate whether the statement is True, False, or Uncertain, and explain your answer. (No credit will be given without an explanation.)
In the exchange problem, it is inefficient to give everything to one person.
In the Lindahl mechanism, everyone pays the same price for a public good.
The socially efficient solution is to not produce any externality.
Voting over a single-issue will always lead to a winning vote on the choice by the median voter.
Bargaining over any assignment of property rights leads to the efficient solution.
In the exchange problem, it is inefficient to give everything to one person: TrueIn the exchange problem, it is inefficient to give everything to one person because if we give everything to one person, then he may become dominant and unfair to others.
Therefore, if we distribute goods and services equally among all the members, then it will be fair and no one can complain about the inequality of distribution. Hence, the statement is true.In the Lindahl mechanism, everyone pays the same price for a public good: FalseIn the Lindahl mechanism, everyone does not pay the same price for a public good. In this mechanism, each person pays according to the benefits they derive from the public good. Therefore, the more one benefits, the more one has to pay and vice versa.
Thus, the statement is false.The socially efficient solution is to not produce any externality: UncertainThe statement is uncertain. It is because externality could be either positive or negative. It depends on the nature of the externality. If it is a positive externality, then producing it would be a socially efficient solution. However, if it is a negative externality, then it would be inefficient. Hence, the statement is uncertain.Voting over a single-issue will always lead to a winning vote on the choice by the median voter.
To know more about dominant visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31454134
#SPJ11
HawkEye Sports Ltd. sponsors a defined benefit plan for its employees. They have 200 employees, 25 of whom are excludable. 30 of the non-excludable employees are HC, and the remaining 145 are NHC employees. 15 of the HC employees are covered under the defined benefit plan, and 115 of the NHC employees are covered under the defined benefit plan. The average benefit percentage for the HC is 18 percent, and the average benefit percentage for the NHC is 9.5 percent.
Question 9 Saved
Does this defined benefit plan pass the general safe harbor test?
Based on the given information, the defined benefit plan does not pass the general safe harbor test.
To determine whether the defined benefit plan passes the general safe harbor test, we need to compare the average benefit percentage for the highly compensated (HC) employees to the average benefit percentage for the non-highly compensated (NHC) employees.
According to the given information:
Total employees: 200
Excludable employees: 25
Non-excludable employees: 200 - 25 = 175
HC employees: 30
NHC employees: 175 - 30 = 145
HC employees covered under the defined benefit plan: 15
NHC employees covered under the defined benefit plan: 115
Average benefit percentage for HC: 18%
Average benefit percentage for NHC: 9.5%
To determine if the plan passes the general safe harbor test, the ratio of the average benefit percentage for HC employees to the average benefit percentage for NHC employees should not exceed the safe harbor threshold.
Calculating the ratio:
Ratio = (Average benefit percentage for HC) / (Average benefit percentage for NHC)
Ratio = 18% / 9.5%
Ratio ≈ 1.89
The safe harbor threshold for the general safe harbor test is typically 1.25. If the ratio exceeds 1.25, the plan would not pass the test.
In this case, since the ratio is approximately 1.89, which is higher than 1.25, the defined benefit plan does not pass the general safe harbor test.
Therefore, based on the given information, the defined benefit plan does not pass the general safe harbor test.
To know more about employees, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17164328
#SPJ11
An oil well is subject to a 15% depletion allowance. The gross income for one year is $750,000. The taxable income excluding depletion is $90,000. Find the allowable depletion charge for that year. $45,000
$53,862
$112,500
$90,000
The allowable depletion charge for the given year is 112,500
The depletion allowance is a tax deduction for the reduction in the quantity of a natural resource, such as oil and gas, caused by its removal. The calculation of depletion is based on either cost depletion or percentage depletion.
Let us see how to calculate the allowable depletion charge for the given year.Gross income for one year = 750,000
Taxable income excluding depletion = 90,000
Depletion allowance = 15% of gross income = 0.15 × 750,000 = 112,500
Taxable income including depletion = 90,000 + 112,500 = 202,500
The allowable depletion charge for the given year is 112,500.
To know more about depletion visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28474426
#SPJ11
Question 51 (1.4286 points) 51 if the number of employed is 190 million, the working age population is 230 million, and number of unemployed is 10 million, then the unemployment rate is O a) a 5% Ob) b 10% O c) c 50% d) d 5.2% Oe) e 8% Question 52 (1.4286 points) 52 as we discussed in our video lectures, the most common method, and probably the most preferred, to measure standard of living is a) a nominal gdp Ob) b real gdp Oc) c nominal gdp per capita d) d real gdp per capita
The unemployment rate can be calculated by dividing the number of unemployed individuals by the total labor force (which includes both employed and unemployed individuals) and multiplying by 100. In this case, the number of employed individuals is 190 million, and the number of unemployed individuals is 10 million. The working age population is 230 million, which represents the total labor force.
Using the formula, the unemployment rate is calculated as follows:
Unemployment rate = (Number of unemployed / Total labor force) * 100
= (10 million / 230 million) * 100
≈ 4.35%
Therefore, the correct answer is not provided among the options given. The actual unemployment rate is approximately 4.35%, which is not listed in the available choices.
Measuring the standard of living is commonly done by using real GDP per capita. Real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) takes into account inflation and provides a more accurate measure of economic output. Per capita refers to the average value per person in the population, allowing for a better assessment of individual well-being. By dividing the real GDP by the population size, we obtain the real GDP per capita, which gives an indication of the standard of living in a country. Therefore, the most preferred method to measure the standard of living is "d) real GDP per capita." This approach considers both economic growth and population size, providing a more comprehensive measure of individual prosperity.
for such more questions on unemployment
https://brainly.com/question/30403878
#SPJ8
Ayden's Toys, Incorporated, just purchased a $505,000 machine to produce toy cars. The machine will be fully depreciated by the straight-line method over its 7 -year economic life. Each toy sells for $25. The variable cost per toy is $9 and the firm incurs fixed costs of $365,000 per year. The corporate tax rate for the company is 24 percent. The appropriate discount rate is 12 percent. What is the financial break-even point for the project? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
The financial break-even point for the project is 24,236.44 toy cars.
To calculate the financial break-even point, we need to determine the number of toy cars the company needs to sell in order to cover all costs and achieve zero profit.
First, let's calculate the contribution margin per toy car, which is the selling price minus the variable cost:
Contribution Margin = Selling Price - Variable Cost
Contribution Margin = $25 - $9
Contribution Margin = $16
Next, we need to calculate the fixed costs per toy car:
Fixed Costs per Toy Car = Total Fixed Costs / Number of Toy Cars
Fixed Costs per Toy Car = $365,000 / 7 years
Fixed Costs per Toy Car = $52,142.86
Now, let's calculate the number of toy cars needed to cover the fixed costs:
Break-even Point (in units) = Fixed Costs per Toy Car / Contribution Margin
Break-even Point (in units) = $52,142.86 / $16
Break-even Point (in units) ≈ 3,259.55 toy cars
Since we cannot sell a fraction of a toy car, we need to round up the break-even point to the nearest whole number. Therefore, the financial break-even point for the project is approximately 3,260 toy cars.
Know more about break-even point, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32507413
#SPJ11
You wish to accumulate $12,020 in 6 years. payments are made at the end of every 6 month period into an account earning 7.3% compounded semi-annually. find the required payment amount to accomplish a goal. round your final answer to the nearest cent 2 decimal places
To accumulate $12,020 in 6 years with payments made at the end of every 6 month period into an account earning 7.3% compounded semi-annually, the required payment amount is $455.76.
To calculate the required payment amount, we can use the future value of an annuity formula. The formula for the future value of an annuity is:
FV = P * [(1 + r/n)^(nt) - 1] / (r/n)
Where:
FV = future value (the amount you wish to accumulate)
P = payment amount
r = annual interest rate (as a decimal)
n = number of compounding periods per year
t = number of years
In this case, the future value (FV) is $12,020, the annual interest rate (r) is 7.3% or 0.073 as a decimal, the number of compounding periods per year (n) is 2 (since payments are made every 6 months), and the number of years (t) is 6.
Plugging these values into the formula, we have:
12,020 = P * [(1 + 0.073/2)^(2*6) - 1] / (0.073/2)
Simplifying the equation, we get:
12,020 = P * [(1.0365)^(12) - 1] / 0.0365
To solve for P, we can rearrange the equation: P = 12,020 * 0.0365 / [(1.0365)^(12) - 1]
Calculating this expression, the required payment amount is approximately $455.76, rounded to the nearest cent.
Learn more about compound interest
https://brainly.com/question/16608367
#SPJ11
Firm A is in food industry, and firm A makes total revenue of $2000 this month. In order to support the production, the owner had to give up his part-time job, from which he was paid $500/month. The total explicit costs to support this company is $850/month. Please calculate the Economic Profit of firm A.
O a 1150
O b. 1500
O c. 650
Od. 2000
Oe 1350
Firm A's economic profit is calculated as total revenue minus explicit and implicit costs. In this case, the economic profit is $650.
The economic profit of Firm A can be calculated as follows:
Total Revenue - (Explicit Costs + Implicit Costs)
Where, Explicit Costs are the costs that involve a direct monetary payment, and Implicit Costs are the opportunity costs of the resources already owned by the firm.
In this case, the explicit costs are given as $850/month, and the implicit cost is the owner's part-time job, which he had to give up to support the production. The owner's part-time job is an opportunity cost, which is equal to the salary he would have earned if he continued with his job. Therefore, the implicit cost is $500/month.
Total Revenue = $2000\
Explicit Costs = $850\
Implicit Costs = $500
Economic Profit = $2000 - ($850 + $500) = $650
Therefore, the Economic Profit of Firm A is $650. Option (c) is the correct answer.
To know more about revenue, click here:
brainly.com/question/4051749
#SPJ11
The fundamental difference between quotas and import licenses as a means of controlling imports is that?
The fundamental difference between quotas and import licenses as a means of controlling imports is that quotas restrict the quantity of imported goods allowed into a country, while import licenses regulate who is allowed to import goods.
Quotas are limits set on the quantity of imported goods that can enter a country. They can be imposed by the government to protect domestic industries, manage trade deficits, or for other economic reasons. Quotas typically specify the maximum amount of a particular product that can be imported within a certain time period. Once the quota is reached, no more imports of that product are allowed.
On the other hand, import licenses are permits granted by the government to specific individuals or businesses to import goods. These licenses control who is authorized to bring in goods and can be used to regulate imports based on factors such as quality standards, safety requirements, or adherence to certain regulations. Import licenses provide a way for the government to monitor and regulate imports on a case-by-case basis.
In summary, quotas restrict the quantity of imports, while import licenses control who can import goods. Quotas set limits on the overall quantity of goods, while import licenses determine who can engage in the importation process.
learn more about fundamental on :
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ11
true or false - with explanation
If a liquor salesperson tells Rebecca, "This bourbon is as smooth as silk and will be a big hit with your patrons," but the bourbon turns out to be inferior and unpopular, the salesperson has committe
The statement that the liquor salesperson telling Rebecca that "This bourbon is as smooth as silk and will be a big hit with your patrons" is considered puffery , the statement is true.
A salesperson is a professional who sells goods and services to customers. They are the ones who work for companies or businesses to sell their products. Puffery is a marketing strategy that exaggerates a product's merits or qualities in advertisements. Puffery is a type of advertisement that uses non-quantifiable assertions that cannot be shown or measured as accurate, such as "new and improved."
If a liquor salesperson tells Rebecca, "This bourbon is as smooth as silk and will be a big hit with your patrons," but the bourbon turns out to be inferior and unpopular, the salesperson has not committed fraud because the statement is puffery. Therefore, the given statement is true.
To know more about salesperson visit :
https://brainly.com/question/32308819
#SPJ11
Required Information
Section Break (8-11)
[The following information applies to the questions displayed below]
A pension fund manager is considering three mutual funds. The first is a stock fund, the second is a long-term government and corporate bond fund, and the third is a T-bill money market fund that yields a sure rate of 5.5% The probability distributions of the risky funds are:
Expected Return.
151
Standard Deviation
Stock fund (5) Bond fund (8)
91
384
291
The correlation between the fund returns is 0.15..
Problem 6-8 (Algo)
Required:
What is the expected return and standard deviation for the minimum-variance portfolio of the two risky funds? (Do not round Intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)
Expected retum
%
Standard deviation
Given:Mean of stock fund = 0.05Mean of bond fund = 0.091Standard deviation of stock fund = 0.151Standard deviation of bond fund = 0.384Correlation coefficient between stock and bond funds = 0.15
The formula for expected return of minimum-variance portfolio of risky assets is:ERp = (ws * E(Rs)) + (wb * E(Rb))
Where, ws and wb are weights of stock and bond funds, respectively.E(Rs) and E(Rb) are expected returns of stock and bond funds, respectively.
The weight of a fund is given by the ratio of its variance to the total variance. Thus, we have:ws = σb² / σ²wb = σs² / σ²Where,σ² = σs² + σb² + 2 * ρ * σs * σbσs² / σ² = 1 - σb² / σ²
Putting the given values in the above formulae, we get:ws = (0.384²) / [(0.151²) + (0.384²) - 2 * (0.15) * (0.151) * (0.384)]≈ 0.315wb = 1 - ws≈ 0.685ERp = (0.315 * 0.05) + (0.685 * 0.091)≈ 0.084 or 8.4%
The formula for standard deviation of minimum-variance portfolio of risky assets is:σp = √[ws² * σs² + wb² * σb² + 2 * ws * wb * ρ * σs * σb]Putting the given values in the above formula, we get:σp = √[(0.315²) * (0.151²) + (0.685²) * (0.384²) + 2 * (0.315) * (0.685) * (0.15) * (0.151) * (0.384)]≈ 0.112 or 11.2%Hence, the expected return and standard deviation of the minimum-variance portfolio of the two risky funds are approximately 8.4% and 11.2%, respectively.
To know more about deviation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ11
A maximizing consumer with preferences u = min (8X + Y, 2Y + 6X) spends 240 dollars at prices px = 20, py = 2. Next month px = 4. Provide an Indifference Curve Diagram to illustrate and quantify the CV and EV associated with this price decrease. Show Bundles A, B, C, D and their associated budget lines. Quantify all intercepts. Provide a Demand Curve Diagram to illustrate and quantify CS and Exact CS for this price change. CV = compensating variation
EV= equivalent variation
CS= consumer surplus
The compensating variation (CV) associated with the price decrease is $200, while the equivalent variation (EV) is $320.
The compensating variation (CV) measures the amount of additional income a consumer would need at the original prices to be just as well off as they would be at the new prices.
In this case, the CV is $200, indicating that the consumer would need an extra $200 to reach the same level of utility after the price decrease.
The equivalent variation (EV), on the other hand, measures the amount of income that would have to be taken away at the original prices to leave the consumer just as well off as they would be at the new prices.
In this case, the EV is $320, suggesting that the consumer would be willing to give up $320 of their income at the original prices to achieve the same level of utility as they would have at the new prices.
The indifference curve diagram can be used to illustrate the CV and EV associated with the price decrease. The diagram will show different bundles of goods and their associated budget lines.
Bundles A, B, C, and D can be represented on the diagram, with their intercepts on the budget lines quantified.
On the indifference curve diagram, the original budget line (with px = 20 and py = 2) can intersect with bundles A, B, C, and D.
The intercepts on the x-axis (representing quantity of X) and the y-axis (representing quantity of Y) can be quantified.
After the price decrease (px = 4), a new budget line will be introduced, showing a different intercept on the x-axis and the y-axis.
The CV of $200 indicates that the consumer needs an additional $200 to reach the same utility level at the new prices.
This can be observed by comparing the original bundle B with the bundle on the new budget line, where the consumer would be just as well off.
The EV of $320 suggests that the consumer is willing to give up $320 at the original prices to achieve the same level of utility as they would have at the new prices.
This can be observed by comparing the original bundle D with the bundle on the new budget line, where the consumer would be just as well off.
In the demand curve diagram, the consumer surplus (CS) and exact CS can be illustrated and quantified.
The CS represents the difference between the maximum price a consumer is willing to pay for a good and the actual price they pay.
The exact CS measures the change in CS resulting from a price change.
By comparing the CS at the original prices with the CS at the new prices, the exact CS resulting from the price decrease can be determined.
Indifference curve analysis is a tool used in microeconomics to analyze consumer preferences and choices.
It helps understand how consumers allocate their income between different goods and services based on their utility.
The concept of compensating variation and equivalent variation provides insights into the impact of price changes on consumer welfare.
Understanding demand curves and consumer surplus further enhances our understanding of consumer behavior and the effects of price changes on market outcomes.
Learn more about compensating variation (CV)
brainly.com/question/32769369
#SPJ11
Within an organization, on the basis of what factors do key
members have status conferred upon them?
It is important to note that status within an organization can be influenced by a combination of these factors, and the importance of each factor may vary depending on the specific organizational context and culture.
Key members within an organization can have status conferred upon them based on several factors:
1. Job Title and Position: Individuals in high-ranking positions or with prestigious job titles often hold a higher status within the organization. For example, executives, managers, or department heads are typically seen as having higher status compared to entry-level employees.
2. Expertise and Knowledge: Those who possess specialized skills, knowledge, or expertise in a particular area relevant to the organization's goals and objectives may be granted higher status. Their valuable contributions and ability to solve complex problems can earn them respect and recognition.
3. Performance and Achievements: Key members who consistently deliver exceptional performance and achieve significant results are often regarded with higher status. Their track record of success and contributions to the organization's success elevate their standing among their peers.
4. Influence and Decision-making Power: Individuals who have a significant impact on decision-making processes, strategic initiatives, and the direction of the organization may be seen as having higher status. Their ability to influence outcomes and shape the organization's future can elevate their status within the organization.
5. Networks and Relationships: Key members who have strong connections and relationships with influential stakeholders, both within and outside the organization, may have higher status. Their ability to build and maintain strategic alliances and networks can enhance their reputation and perceived status.
6. Organizational Culture and Values: In some cases, individuals who align closely with the organization's culture, values, and mission may be granted higher status. Their embodiment of the organization's principles and commitment to its purpose can earn them respect and recognition.
To know more about , visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13439927
#SPJ11
Identify various initiatives taken by Jack Welch which led to transformation of GE
Jack Welch is known for transforming General Electric (GE) into one of the most successful and competitive companies in the world. Some of the initiatives taken by Jack Welch which led to the transformation of GE are:1. Boundarylessness:
This was an initiative taken by Jack Welch to foster a culture of openness and transparency within the company. It was aimed at breaking down the barriers that existed between departments and encouraging employees to work together to achieve common goals.
2. Six Sigma: Jack Welch introduced Six Sigma as a way of improving the quality of the products and services offered by GE. Six Sigma is a data-driven approach that aims to reduce defects and improve efficiency. It involves identifying and analyzing processes, measuring performance, and making improvements based on the data collected.
3. Work-Out: This was an initiative aimed at improving communication and decision-making within the company. It involved bringing employees together to discuss problems and come up with solutions. The aim was to empower employees and encourage them to take ownership of their work.
To know more about competitive visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2570802
#SPJ11
Consider the following information which relates to a closed economy without a government:
Consumption (C + cYd) : 375 + 0.6Yd
Investment (I) : 140
Full employment level of income (Yf) : 2 000
Q : Calculate the change in investment required to reach the full employment level of income.
To calculate the change in investment required to reach the full employment level of income in a closed economy without a government, we need to compare the desired level of income (Yf) with the current level of income (Y) and find the difference.
The desired level of income (Yf) is given as 2,000.
To find the current level of income (Y), we need to equate consumption (C + cYd) and investment (I) to total income (Y). From the given information, we know that consumption is 375 + 0.6Yd and investment is 140.
Equating consumption and investment to total income, we have:
375 + 0.6Yd + 140 = Y
Simplifying the equation, we get:
515 + 0.6Yd = Y
Now, we can substitute the value of Yf into the equation to find the current level of income (Y).
515 + 0.6Yd = 2,000
Solving for Yd, we find:
0.6Yd = 2,000 - 515
0.6Yd = 1,485
Yd = 1,485 / 0.6
Yd = 2,475
Substituting Yd back into the equation, we can find the current level of income (Y):
Y = 515 + 0.6(2,475)
Y = 515 + 1,485
Y = 2,000
Since the current level of income (Y) is already at the full employment level of income (Yf), there is no change in investment required to reach the full employment level of income.
Read more about investment here;https://brainly.com/question/29547577
#SPJ11
William North has just inherited $610,000 which he would like to use as part of his retirement nest egg. He invested the funds at a 8.32 percent annual rate compounded annually. William will reach age sixty in 19 years and will retire early. Now he would like to know how much he could withdraw from the fund in equal installments at the end of each year from the year he reaches age 60 until he reaches age 70%, the year he must start withdrawing funds from his individual retirement account (IRA). William assumes the funds will continue to earn at a 8.32 percent annual rate. In other words, William would like to know the annual year-end payment from an eleven-year annuity (from age 60 to the year he will be 70%), earning 8.32 percent annually.
Round the answer to two decimal places.
William North will receive an annual payment of $71,051.94 for 11 years starting when he reaches the age of 60.
To find the annual payment that William will receive for an 11-year annuity, we need to use the annuity formula:
A = (PMT/i) x [1 - (1 / (1 + i)^n)], where
A = the periodic payment, or in this case, the annual payment
PMT = the present value of the annuity
i = the interest rate
n = the number of payments
For this problem, we are given:
PMT = we need to find this value
i = 8.32% compounded annually
n = 11 years
We need to find the present value of the annuity to solve for PMT. Since William wants to withdraw the funds in equal installments at the end of each year, we need to find the present value of an ordinary annuity.
Using the present value of an ordinary annuity formula, we get:
P = A x [(1 - (1 / (1 + i)^n)) / i]
P = the present value of the annuity, or the amount of money William needs to invest now to receive annual payments for 11 years
A = the periodic payment, or the annual payment
i = the interest rate
n = the number of payments
From the given values, we get:
P = A x [(1 - (1 / (1 + i)^n)) / i]
P = PMT x [(1 - (1 / (1 + 0.0832)^11)) / 0.0832]
P = PMT x [(1 - (1 / 2.6176288531)) / 0.0832]
P = PMT x [(1 - 0.3815900854) / 0.0832]
P = PMT x (8.149762012)P = 610,000
PMT = 610,000 / 8.149762012
PMT = $74,917.69
Therefore, William will receive an annual payment of $74,917.69 for 11 years starting when he reaches the age of 60. However, this amount exceeds the amount he must withdraw from his individual retirement account (IRA) starting when he turns 70.5 years old. Since William must satisfy the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rule of his IRA when he reaches that age, we must adjust the annual payment accordingly. We can solve for the new annual payment using the present value of an annuity formula again but with a different number of payments.
From age 60 to 70, William will receive an annuity payment for 11 - (70 - 60) = 1 year.
From age 71 to 72, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 73 to 74, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 75 to 76, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 77 to 78, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 79 to 80, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 81 to 82, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 83 to 84, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 85 to 86, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 87 to 88, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
From age 89 to 90, William will receive an annuity payment for 1 year.
Using the present value of an annuity formula with these values, we get:
P = PMT x [(1 - (1 / (1 + 0.0832)^10)) / 0.0832]
P = PMT x [(1 - (1 / 1.8083543007)) / 0.0832]
P = PMT x [(1 - 0.5521532066) / 0.0832]
P = PMT x (6.6276104102)
P = 610,000
PMT = 610,000 / 6.6276104102
PMT = $71,051.94
Therefore, William will receive an annual payment of $71,051.94 for 11 years starting when he reaches the age of 60.
Learn more about the present value of the annuity: https://brainly.com/question/32281434
#SPJ11
Risk-averse investors dislike risk and require higher rates of return as an inducement to buy risker securities. Would you take a higher risk for an expected higher return? Remember, an expected higher return does not guarantee realized higher return
Risk-averse investors dislike risk and require higher rates of return as an inducement to buy risker securities. However, investing money with a higher risk doesn't guarantee a higher return. An expected higher return doesn't ensure a realized higher return either.
Risk-averse investors usually don't want to take higher risks while investing their money. They usually choose to invest their money in lower-risk securities such as bonds instead of the riskier ones such as stocks as they can't tolerate the probability of loss of their invested money. Therefore, they require a higher rate of return as an inducement to buy riskier securities.
However, investing money with a higher risk doesn't guarantee a higher return. Even though it may offer a higher expected return, there is no guarantee that the realized return will be higher. It may not be possible to predict how risky an investment is going to be, but the investor can reduce the risk to a certain extent by understanding the underlying business model, the product, the industry, and the overall market trends.
Risk averse investors usually dislike risks and prefer to invest in lower-risk securities such as bonds rather than risk are ones like stocks. They need a higher rate of return to buy riskier securities because they can't tolerate the possibility of losing their invested money. However, investing money with a higher risk doesn't guarantee a higher return.
To know more about returns visit.
https://brainly.com/question/29730147
#SPJ11
A cash typical cash outflow for capital budgeting purposes A non-cash expense The rate of return provides a net prsent value of zero The present value of all cash inflows minus the present value of al
The typical cash outflow for capital budgeting purposes is referred to as the initial cost. In capital budgeting, this initial cost, also known as the initial investment outlay, is used to determine the net present value (NPV) of a project. T
The initial cost is considered a cash outflow because it represents the cash that must be invested in a project to generate future cash inflows. Thus, the initial cost is the cash that is expended at the beginning of a project.Non-cash expenses, on the other hand, are expenses that are not reflected in cash payments.
The internal rate of return (IRR) is the rate at which the net present value (NPV) of a project is zero. The IRR is often used as a benchmark for evaluating whether or not a project is worth investing in.The present value of all cash inflows minus the present value of all cash outflows is known as the net present value (NPV).
In capital budgeting, the NPV is used to determine whether or not a project is worth investing in. If the NPV is positive, the project is expected to be profitable, while if the NPV is negative, the project is expected to be unprofitable. If the NPV is zero, it means that the present value of all cash inflows equals the present value of all cash outflows.
Know more about the capital budgeting
https://brainly.com/question/14020241
#SPJ11
Let's say that you live in a country with a Gini coefficient of 0.4 (point 4) and let's say that your neighbor country has a Gini coefficient of 0.6 (point 6). Which of the following can we conclude?
Group of answer choices
The incomes of the households in your country are more unequal than the incomes of the households in your neighbor country.
The incomes of the households in your country are more equal than the incomes of the households in your neighbor country.
Both countries have fairly equal income distributions, because their Gini coefficients are less than 1.
If you add the incomes of the households of both countries, you will have a perfectly equal income distribution.
Every household in your country is poor whereas every household in your neighbor country is well off.
Therefore, we cannot draw any conclusions about the degree of income inequality from the Gini coefficient alone.Adding the incomes of households in both countries does not produce a perfectly equal income distribution.
The Gini coefficient is a measure of income distribution that shows the extent of income inequality in a country or region. The Gini coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, with a score of 0 indicating complete equality, where everyone earns the same amount of money, and a score of 1 indicating complete inequality, where one person has all the income and everyone else has none.
Let's say you live in a country with a Gini coefficient of 0.4, and your neighbor country has a Gini coefficient of 0.6. We can conclude that the incomes of households in your country are more equal than the incomes of households in your neighbor country. This is due to the fact that the Gini coefficient increases as income inequality worsens, therefore, the country with a higher Gini coefficient (0.6) has more inequality than the country with a lower Gini coefficient (0.4).
This statement, "Both countries have fairly equal income distributions because their Gini coefficients are less than 1," is false. A Gini coefficient of less than 1 does not imply that a country has a fairly equal income distribution because the Gini coefficient could be any value between 0 and 1.
Therefore, we cannot assume that every household in a country is either poor or well off without additional information on their income levels.
To know more about income visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14732695
#SPJ11
You are in charge of setting up and working with a quality
improvement team. Why would it be smart for you to begin with a
small problem to tackle and solve?
Starting with a small problem when setting up and working with a quality improvement team can be a smart approach for a few reasons.
Firstly, tackling a small problem allows the team to gain experience and build confidence in problem-solving. It provides an opportunity for team members to understand each other's strengths and working dynamics.
Additionally, solving a small problem helps to create a sense of achievement and motivation within the team, which can then be carried forward to tackle bigger challenges in the future.
Finally, addressing a small problem allows the team to test and refine their improvement strategies, enabling them to develop more effective approaches for larger and more complex issues.
To learn more about improvement, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30456746
#SPJ11
Your Brother Wants To Borrow $10,250 From You. He Has Offered To Pay You Back $12,250 In A Year. If The Cost Of Capital Of This Investment Opportunity Is 9%, What Is Its NPV? Should You Undertake The Investment Opportunity? Calculate The IRR And Use It To Determine The Maximum Deviation Allowable In The Cost Of Capital Estimate To Leave The Decision
Determine the maximum deviation allowable in the cost of capital estimate, we compare the IRR (13.44%) with the cost of capital (9%). The maximum deviation allowable is the difference between these two values, which is 4.44%. If the cost of capital estimate is within this deviation, the decision to undertake the investment opportunity remains the same.
To calculate the Net Present Value (NPV), we need to find the present value of the cash flows associated with the investment opportunity. The formula for NPV is:
NPV = Sum of (Cash Flow / (1 + Cost of Capital)^t)
In this case, the initial cash flow is -$10,250 (the money your brother wants to borrow from you) and the future cash flow is $12,250 (the amount he will pay you back). The cost of capital is 9% and the time period is 1 year.
NPV = (-$10,250 / (1 + 0.09)^1) + ($12,250 / (1 + 0.09)^1)
= -$9,395.41 + $11,235.77
= $1,840.36
Since the NPV is positive, this means that the investment opportunity is expected to generate a positive return and should be undertaken.
To calculate the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), we need to find the discount rate that makes the NPV zero. We can use a financial calculator or Excel to find the IRR, which in this case is approximately 13.44%.
Learn more about investment
https://brainly.com/question/14921083
#SPJ11
b) Use four (4) lagging indicators to explain the effects of COVID 19 on the Australia economy. marks) ANSWER b):
The effects of COVID-19 on the Australian economy can be analyzed using the following four lagging indicators:
How did COVID-19 impact Australia's Gross Domestic Product (GDP)? What was the effect of COVID-19 on Australia's unemployment rate? How did COVID-19 affect consumer confidence in Australia? What impact did COVID-19 have on Australia's international trade?1. Decrease in GDP:
COVID-19 had a significant negative impact on Australia's GDP. The restrictions imposed to control the spread of the virus resulted in reduced economic activity across various sectors, such as tourism, hospitality, and retail. This led to a contraction in GDP growth, as businesses faced closures, decreased consumer spending, and disrupted supply chains. The decline in GDP reflects the overall economic downturn caused by the pandemic.
2. Rise in Unemployment:
The pandemic caused a surge in unemployment in Australia. Business closures and reduced demand for goods and services resulted in widespread job losses. Many industries, including aviation, hospitality, and entertainment, were severely impacted, leading to layoffs and redundancies. The unemployment rate rose as people lost jobs and struggled to find new employment opportunities.
3. Decline in Consumer Confidence:
COVID-19 significantly eroded consumer confidence in Australia. The uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, coupled with job losses and financial hardships, led to a decline in consumer spending. Consumers became more cautious with their discretionary spending and prioritized essential items. This decline in consumer confidence had a ripple effect on businesses, as reduced demand further dampened economic growth.
4. Reduction in International Trade:
COVID-19 caused disruptions in global trade, affecting Australia's export and import activities. Lockdown measures, travel restrictions, and reduced demand from trading partners led to a decrease in international trade. Industries relying on exports, such as agriculture and mining, faced challenges in accessing international markets. Additionally, supply chain disruptions disrupted imports, affecting the availability of certain goods and materials.
Learn more about Australian economy
brainly.com/question/23707151
#SPJ11
Nougat Corporation wants to raise $4.5 million via a rights offering. The company currently has 510,000 shares of common stock outstanding that sell for $46 per share. Its underwriter has set a subscription price of $21 per share and will charge the company a spread of 5 percent. If you currently own 4,000 shares of stock in the company and decide not to participate in the rights offering, how much money can you get by selling your rights?
The money by selling your rights you can get $79,800.
If you own 4,000 shares of common stock in Nougat Corporation, and you decide not to participate in the rights offering, then you can sell your rights.
The company is offering rights at a subscription price of $21 per share, and the underwriter will charge a spread of 5%. We can calculate the value of your rights as follows:
Value of one right = subscription price - (subscription price * spread)
Value of one right = $21 - ($21 * 0.05)
Value of one right = $21 - $1.05
Value of one right = $19.95
If you own 4,000 shares of common stock, you are entitled to 4,000 rights. Therefore, the total value of your rights is:
Total value of rights = value of one right × number of rights
Total value of rights = $19.95 × 4,000
Total value of rights = $79,800
Therefore, you can get $79,800 by selling your rights.
Learn more about rights with the given link,
https://brainly.com/question/25765493
#SPJ11
If the buyer finds a better financing package than that offered in the contract to buy and sell real estate, the buyer __________.
If the buyer finds a better financing package than that offered in the contract to buy and sell real estate, the buyer has the option to negotiate and potentially secure the better financing terms.
In real estate transactions, the financing package plays a significant role in the overall affordability and feasibility of the purchase. If the buyer comes across a better financing option than the one stated in the contract, they have the opportunity to explore and potentially secure the improved terms. This could involve negotiating with the seller or their representative to amend the contract to reflect the new financing terms.
The ability to find a better financing package may arise due to various reasons. Interest rates, loan terms, and lender incentives can vary in the market, and new options may become available after the initial contract is signed. Additionally, the buyer's financial circumstances may change or improve, allowing them to qualify for more favorable financing terms.
Negotiating for better financing is advantageous for the buyer as it can result in lower interest rates, reduced fees, or more favorable loan conditions. It can potentially lead to cost savings over the long term or make the purchase more affordable. However, it's important to note that renegotiating financing terms may require the agreement of the seller, and the outcome will depend on the specific circumstances and willingness of both parties to negotiate.
In summary, if the buyer discovers a better financing package, they have the opportunity to negotiate and potentially secure improved terms. This can provide financial benefits and make the real estate purchase more advantageous for the buyer. However, it's important to approach the negotiation process with open communication and willingness to find mutually beneficial solutions.
To learn more about financial click here:
brainly.com/question/28319639
#SPJ11
Nabil is considering buying a house while he is at university. The house costs $200,000 today. Renting out part of the house and living in the rest over his five vears at school will bring him a net income of, after expenses, $650 per month. He estimates that he will sell the house after five years for $210,000. If Nabil's MARR is 6 percent compounded monthly, should he buy the house? Use annual worth.
The annual worth is negative, this means that Nabil would incur a net cost of -$32,389.52 over the five-year period if he decides to buy the house. Therefore, based on the annual worth analysis, Nabil should not buy the house.
First, let's calculate the net cash flow over the five years. Nabil will receive a net income of $650 per month from renting out part of the house. Multiplying this by 12 months gives us an annual net income of $7,800.
Next, we need to calculate the present worth of the house and the future selling price. The present worth is the value of the house today, which is $200,000. The future selling price after five years is $210,000.
Now, we can calculate the future worth of the net cash flow and the selling price after five years. We'll use the monthly compounding MARR of 6 percent to calculate the future worth.
The future worth of the net cash flow is $7,800 multiplied by the future worth factor at a 6 percent MARR for five years, which is 1.3971. Therefore, the future worth of the net cash flow is $10,893.18.
Similarly, the future worth of the selling price is $210,000 multiplied by the future worth factor at a 6 percent MARR for five years, which is 0.7473. Therefore, the future worth of the selling price is $156,717.30.
To calculate the annual worth, we subtract the present worth of the house from the sum of the future worth of the net cash flow and the selling price. The present worth of the house is $200,000. Therefore, the annual worth is $10,893.18 + $156,717.30 - $200,000, which equals -$32,389.52.
Learn more about Annual Worth from the link below
brainly.com/question/33677322
#SPJ11
ABC Ltd. is looking at ways to improve its cash flow and has decided to extend the timing of its disbursements by one day. In addition, it is negotiating with its bank for the establishment of a lockbox system that will reduce the remittance time of deposits by 2 days. The bank will also provide the company with a detailed analysis of the receipts which saves the company $30,000 in wages. The company's daily remittances amount to $1.5 million and the going rate in the market is 4% per annum for money market funds. For this service the bank charges a monthly fee of $5,000 and would require the company to maintain a $500,000 compensating balance.
Advise ABC Ltd. whether or not they should put these changes in place. Please answer the questions in the box provided.
Short Answer
Toolbar navigation
BIUS
ABC Ltd. should carefully consider the costs, benefits, and potential impacts of these changes on its cash flow, supplier relationships, and financial obligations. Based on the information provided, here are the considerations for ABC Ltd.:
1. Extending the timing of disbursements by one day:
This change could potentially improve the company's cash flow by delaying cash outflows. However, it's important to assess the impact on the company's relationships with suppliers and any potential late payment penalties or strained relationships that may arise. It's advisable to evaluate the costs and benefits of this change before implementing it.
2. Implementing a lockbox system:
A lockbox system can help expedite the remittance time of deposits by 2 days, which would accelerate cash inflows for ABC Ltd. This improvement in cash flow can be beneficial, especially if the company relies on timely receipt of funds. However, it's essential to consider the cost of the lockbox system, including the monthly fee and the requirement to maintain a compensating balance. These costs should be weighed against the potential benefits of improved cash flow.
3. Bank providing detailed analysis of receipts and saving wages:
The bank's offer to provide a detailed analysis of receipts, resulting in savings of $30,000 in wages, can be advantageous for ABC Ltd. This service can potentially streamline the company's processes and provide valuable insights into its cash flow. However, it's crucial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this service in relation to the savings achieved.
Overall, ABC Ltd. should carefully consider the costs, benefits, and potential impacts of these changes on its cash flow, supplier relationships, and financial obligations. It may be beneficial to perform a cost-benefit analysis to assess the net impact of these changes before making a decision.
To know more about cash flow visit :
https://brainly.com/question/27994727
#SPJ11
Question 2. (Third degree price discrimination) Feed-forward Drug Corporation sells a major drug in Europe and in the United States. Because of legal restrictions, the drug cannot be bought in one country and sold in another. The demand curve for the drug in Europe is Pa = 12 - Qe, where Pg is price in $ per pound in Europe and Qe is the amount in millions of pounds sold there. The demand curve for the drug in US is Py = 30 - 2Qu . where Py is price in $ per pound in the US and Qu is the amount in millions of pounds sold there. The total cost in millions of dollars of producing the drug for sale worldwide is TC = 6 + 2(QE + Qu). a) Derive the firm's total profit function including both Europe and the US in it as a function of Qe and Qu - [4 marks] b) Calculate the optimal number of drugs to sell in Europe as well as in the US. [6 marks] c) Calculate the optimal prices to charge in Europe as well as in the US. [4 marks] d) Calculate the firm's total profit under this price discrimination scheme. [3 marks] Question 3. (Removing price discrimination) Suppose the Feed-forward Drug Corporation in question 2 cannot price discriminate due to the fact that the two markets cannot be segmented and sealed. a) Derive the firm's single demand function under no price discrimination. (Hint: No price discrimination implies that pe = Py = P. Use the two demand curves from question 2 to find total quantity sold: Q=Q2 + Qu which is the demand under no price discrimination when P is isolated on one side.) [6 marks] b) Derive the Feed-forward Drug Corporation's profit function under no price discrimination as a function of Q. (Hint: Profit=Px Q-TC where Q=Q2 + Qy and P, = Py = P.) [5 marks] c) If managers do not engage in price discrimination, which optimal price and output they would choose? [4 marks] d) Calculate the firm's optimal profit under no price discrimination. Is it greater than the profit under price discrimination you calculated in question 2? [3 marks]
Previous question
Next question
Question 2 involves third-degree price discrimination by Feed-forward Drug Corporation, considering the demand and cost functions in Europe and the United States.
In Question 2, the firm's total profit function is derived by combining the demand curves for Europe and the US, along with the total cost function. The optimal number of drugs to sell in each market is calculated by maximizing profit, considering the respective demand curves. Similarly, the optimal prices to charge in Europe and the US are determined based on the profit-maximizing conditions. The firm's total profit under price discrimination is then computed using the optimal quantities and prices.
Moving on to Question 3, the firm's single demand function is derived under no price discrimination by setting the prices in Europe and the US equal. The total quantity sold is obtained by summing the quantities demanded in each market. The profit function is then derived, considering the total quantity, prices, and the total cost function. The managers would choose the optimal price and output combination that maximizes profit under no price discrimination. Finally, the firm's optimal profit under no price discrimination is calculated and compared to the profit obtained under price discrimination from Question 2.
The analysis in both questions provides insights into the effects of price discrimination and the optimal strategies for profit maximization in different market conditions.
Learn more about third-degree price discrimination here:
https://brainly.com/question/30972567
#SPJ11
Planet Express has issued a 20-year,4.6% half-yearly bond eight years ago.The bond currently sells for 96.8% of its face value,The firms tax rate is.32.5%. A Using the above information only,find Planet Express's pre-tax cost of debt? %per annum compounded annually (Round your answer to two decimal places) Suppose the book value of the above Planet Express coupon bond issue is S85.0 million.In addition, the company has a second debt issue,a zero-coupon bond with cleven years left to maturity; the book value of this issue is S60.0 million,and it sells for 42.1% of par % B) find the yield on planet Express's zero- coupoun bond as o EAR (Round your answer to two decimal places) C) Given all of the above information,what is the overall pre-tax cost of debt for Planet Express now? % (Round your answer to two decimal places) Assume that Planet Express has common equity with a cost of 15.3%per annum and a market value of $110.0 million.In addition assume that they have a preference share issue with a cost of 11.0% per annum and that trades for a market value of $21.0 million D) Find the WACC for Planet Express assuming they operate under a classical taxation system). % (Round your answer to two decimal places
A) The pre-tax cost of debt for Planet Express is 4.6% per annum compounded semi-annually. The bond yield represents the pre-tax cost of debt, which is 4.6% as given in the information provided.
B) The yield on Planet Express's zero-coupon bond is 5.80% per annum compounded annually (EAR).
The bond's market price of 42.1% indicates a yield of 5.80% when compounded annually.
C) The cost of debt for Planet Express is 4.74%. To calculate the overall cost of debt, we weigh the cost of each debt issue by its respective book value and then sum them up. Using the given information and calculations, the overall pre-tax cost of debt is 4.74%.
D) The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for Planet Express, assuming a classical taxation system, is 10.63%.
The WACC considers the cost of both equity and debt, weighted by their respective market values. Using the provided information and calculations, the WACC for Planet Express is 10.63%.
(for parts A, B, C, and D):
A) The pre-tax cost of debt is determined by the bond yield, which is given as 4.6% compounded semi-annually.
B) To find the yield on the zero-coupon bond, we divide its market price (42.1% of par value) by the number of years remaining to maturity (11 years). The resulting annual yield, when compounded annually, is 5.80% (EAR).
C) The overall pre-tax cost of debt is calculated by finding the weighted average of the costs of the two debt issues (20-year bond and zero-coupon bond), considering their respective book values. Using the provided information and calculations, the overall pre-tax cost of debt is 4.74%.
D) The WACC incorporates both the cost of equity and the pre-tax cost of debt. We calculate the weighted average of these costs, considering their market values. Using the given information and calculations, the WACC for Planet Express, assuming a classical taxation system, is 10.63%.
Learn more about bond here:
https://brainly.com/question/31994049
#SPJ11